Minorities at IBM can get ahead without doing any work. Nearly everyone else is stuck at the bottom. - Software Engineer IBM Employee Review

1.0
10 Nov 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The technology and products are way cool. They used to suck in the mid-90's, but now they are cutting edge. Even though most people have to share an office, at least I never had to work in a cubicle. Other people in some of the newer buildings are starting to have to work in cubicles, though. It just depends on where you work within the company.

Cons

I thought I would get ahead at IBM. I thought I would be judged on the work I did. But eing a white man made it nearly impossible to get anywhere. I would see women and minorities do terrible things like not show up for work, work half days when they were getting paid as full time, waste time, lie about status, etc. But when it came time for promotions, appraisals, and rewards, those same people got rewarded very nicely whereas I would work a lot of overtime and had excellent results to show the quality of work I did but never was rewarded by managers. I would hear "you are doing a great job" at appraisal time from my several managers through the years, yet this was never reflected in actual performance ratings or raises. Benefits kept deteriorating every year I was there. IBM used to be the top company for benefits; now it seems like it is in the lower half of companies out there. We used to get free health insurance with very low copays if at all; now there are very high premiums, copays, and deductibles. Since I have a wife and kids, I had to pay a lot more in premiums the last few years I was there. They talk about "work life balance" but then make you work nights and weekends as their projects always slip schedule. I worked my butt off until I finally realized that the politics inside IBM would never allow me to advance. So I quit. I do not regret that decision at all. IBM is a very messed up company internally.

Explore other reviews about IBM

5.0
23 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Incredible mentorship from experienced engineers and exposure to real-world production code. The team is very supportive and encourages questions.

Cons

The onboarding process can be a bit overwhelming at first due to the complexity of the internal tools and systems.

4.0
26 Aug 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Cons

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

636
avatar
IBM Response
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All