Management & training staff unqualified, redundancies making things harder. - Production Operative PepsiCo Employee Review

2.0
4 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Money is not that bad and you get a bonus depending on site performance every 3rd pay packet (every quarter)

Cons

Too much responsibility and the people training you don't actually know the job, so you are completely unprepared. General culture within management is toxic, you need to be involved in multiple projects to be recognised, if you just stay quiet and do what you are actually get paid to do it's difficult to get ahead. Site moral is currently really low following redundancies made to people who were great at their job, and leaving people who don't know what that are doing in place, just because they signed up to safety meetings/projects to avoid work. Currently some uncertainty around the future of the site, lots of lines not running, and more redundancies planned in 2026.

Explore other reviews about PepsiCo

5.0
15 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Solid structure, goals are attainable, strong leadership.

Cons

Fortune 50 company comes with restructuring and potential employees headcount resizing.

4.0
6 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Worked for PepsiCo for 10 years across four locations in Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Florida. Gained experience in multiple sales and operational roles while supporting account growth, merchandising, and customer relationships. Florida locations were especially well-operated and efficient. PepsiCo provided competitive pay, solid benefits through Keystone, and a good vacation package compared to competitors in the beverage industry. The company also offered strong sales incentive programs, earning rewards such as Orlando Magic floor seats, Pro Bowl tickets, Apple Watches, and Yeti cups for exceeding performance goals and driving sales results.

Cons

While PepsiCo promotes internal growth opportunities, many promotions and leadership opportunities appeared to favor college internship hires over long-term internal employees. In some cases, newer college-based management pushed corporate initiatives without fully understanding local market realities or account volume trends. For example, innovation products were sometimes forced into low-volume accounts where sell-through was unrealistic. Operationally, certain delivery processes could be improved, particularly with Tropicana products being stored in coolers on trucks for extended periods, which could impact product quality and increase waste. Work-life balance could also be challenging, as sales representatives commonly worked 50–60 hour weeks. Expectations from corporate leadership were often unrealistic, especially when customer representatives and drivers were expected to fully stock stores while servicing 15+ accounts per day. Experiences could also vary depending on whether locations were union or non-union operated.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All