- Strong leadership team with decades of relevant experience
- Dedicated team and mission focused
- Incredible technology and strong data to back it up
Cons
- Still cleaning up from decisions made by past members of the leadership team.
-Valuable scientific mission
-Strong work ethics from most team members
Cons
-Extremely poor leadership organization, unclear company goals
-Poor communication from leadership, chaotic communication styles
-Leadership members not receptive to feedback
The people below the director level are all hard working and dependable. The company is remote so you don’t have to go into the office
Cons
Everyone is severely underpaid. Benefits suck. The CEO’s daughter is in charge of like half the company. Everyone competent was either let go or quit.