It's one of those stereotyped company where they pretend we all live in a great family, with all the worst coming with it. A crystal clear example of this claim follows: once upon a time, a benevolent boss provided us with individual meetings with a sort of psychologist (but apparently very under-qualified in her field of interest). The meeting lasted almost one hour, and we described what we thought about the company, the internal structure and the operational procedures and routines we all dealt with on a daily basis. The problem is that: 1) we had not been required to sign any documentation (before the individual meetings) dealing with privacy issues (the psychologist was from an external company) and all the stuff that goes with it, and 2) we all thought they were data and information that wouldn't have been discolosed with our bosses; we were thinking that they would have been arranged a lot of pie charts with anonymus and aggregate information (like for example, "what % of our employees is considering shifting internally to a different position within the company?"). The misunderstanding went on until one day we received (from the psychologist) a sort of feedback of our meetings (written in an offensive way), and she wrote that this thing would have been shared with the top-management of the company, with our names and surnames well specified inside the document. I quit my job. Do not apply here, they also pay low wages. What else?
