Infosys - One has to know about! - Software Engineer Infosys Employee Review

4.0
17 May 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Infosys is a one of the good places to work but not the best to be! As an employee for your individual growth plan are much accomplished. You have good lot of talent around you which will always make you have a win-win situation. Matured work culture with nice work ambiance to work peacefully. Infosys has an awesome infrastructure in place. Undoubtedly no other company can beat this.

Cons

Competency evaluation is very bad here. No right for one to choose their own career path. Lot scrap is present at the higher levels which has to be cleared up. Every individual should be billed till 20 years... Middle level management is very unstable and thoughtless minting most of the company revenue. Lower cadre employee is screwed left right top and bottom...

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
27 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Management Resources Work life Balance

Cons

Pay and benefits could be better

4.0
10 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All