I went through a long and demanding interview process at SAZIM over the span of three months, which included three rounds: a 30-minute HR call, a week-long take-home project, and a 2.5-hour technical round. After dedicating significant time and effort to this process, I was disappointed with how it concluded. Issues: Misalignment on Role and Salary: During the initial HR call, I was asked about my current and expected salary. Despite clear discussions, they ultimately offered me a downgraded role, which I accepted considering the potential for growth. However, they then proposed a salary that was actually below my current compensation—something that felt both unprofessional and disrespectful given the extensive interview process and role shift. Time-Consuming Process with Little Value: The multi-stage interview involved significant time investment, especially with a detailed project assignment that took a week to complete. Extending this process over three months only to offer a lower role with less pay felt inconsiderate. Lack of Transparency and Professionalism: The prolonged interview process, lack of clear communication around compensation expectations, and the final offer left a negative impression. Candidates invest time and energy in hopes of a fair and respectful hiring process, and this experience did not meet those expectations.

The interview had 3 sessions, firstly I had to take a software development assessment, and then had a technical interview, and then project review. The assessment mostly focused on making a website, and then technical interview was about solving data structures and algorithm related problems, the problem I was given was pretty easy. And finally, in the project review, I had to explain the whole assessment.