The interview process was overall quite interesting - they had me complete a presentation and an associated task, which I quite enjoyed. After that, they asked questions about the presentation and how it relates to previous roles. I was then asked to give examples based on previous roles.

Review: I recently went through the interview process for a Marketing Manager position at Intuit, which turned out to be a confusing and disappointing experience. Initially, the conversation was promising, and the interview focused on understanding the difference between product marketing and digital marketing. However, during the interview, I encountered a laptop connectivity issue that disrupted the call. Despite following up, I was informed that Intuit is now seeking a candidate with stronger technical skills. This feedback was surprising, as the interview did not include any skill-specific questions beyond the introductory round. I have 9 years of experience in campaign management, including Google Ads, Facebook, LinkedIn Ads, Adobe Campaign, and Marketing Automation tools. Additionally, I possess strong technical skills in Power BI, Python, and MS SQL. My experience includes working at Cleartax for 5 years, where I honed these skills further. Given my extensive experience and technical expertise, the shift in their requirements feels inconsistent. It raises concerns about whether partiality played a role in their decision-making process. I received multiple calls from consultants, indicating that Intuit was initially interested in my profile, making the final outcome even more perplexing. I'm left wondering about the disconnect between my qualifications and their current needs. This experience has left me with questions about No transparency and unfairness of their hiring process