I went through a total of four rounds in the selection process—three technical interviews followed by an online assessment. Unfortunately, I was not able to clear the third technical round, but the overall experience was quite insightful and helped me understand my strengths and areas for improvement. The first technical interview was focused on coding skills. I was asked to solve problems that tested my problem-solving ability, logic building, and familiarity with programming concepts. I performed well in this round and was able to approach the questions confidently. The second interview was more centered around my resume. The discussion revolved around my projects, technical skills, and past experiences. I was able to clearly explain my work, justify my choices, and demonstrate my understanding, which made this round go smoothly. However, the third interview was significantly more challenging. It was designed to deeply evaluate my core knowledge of computer science, including Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA), Object-Oriented Programming (OOPs), and fundamental concepts. The questions required not only theoretical understanding but also the ability to apply concepts in different scenarios. This round highlighted gaps in my depth of knowledge, and I was not able to meet the expectations. Overall, while I did not make it through the final stages, the process was a valuable learning experience. It gave me a clear idea of the level of preparation required, especially in core subjects, and motivated me to strengthen my fundamentals for future opportunities.

Maily for freshers it was focus on in depth core subjects like os dbms and some cn, and medium dsa problems and some sql queries with joints su query and windows function