The interviewer, referred to as the boss, displayed overt condescension towards students without a local degree. While hiring based on merit is reasonable, belittling merits is unquestionably distasteful. Despite not actively applying for the role, I was invited for the interview due to the alignment of my skills. I invested time and effort in the process, only to encounter unfair treatment. (The overall journey to the interview was positive, thanks to the pleasant agent who facilitated it.) It became evident that the boss held preconceived notions about me, making assumptions based on a few superficial questions, such as parental advice and leisure activities. These led her to believe I had minimal experience with adversity due to a sheltered upbringing. This impression conveyed a lack of familiarity with my resume. Whether intentional intimidation aimed at steering me away from the role or not, I'm relieved to be avoiding a potentially problematic situation. The company claims aspirations of transitioning into a social enterprise, but with this elitist mindset, its success in that endeavor remains uncertain. Representing a boss with such attitudes would be discomforting. For a company to foster effective, high-quality employees, fostering a positive work environment is crucial. Employee growth corresponds directly with employer development. As society progresses, it's imperative that the boss evolves in tandem.