Same as other reviewers have said. Leadership principles answered in STAR format. 1 online assessment and then final 5 interviews. 4 just basic tech assessment on debugging and leadership principles and 1 was tech round easy question. I answered everything that was requested but it looked like the interviewers were bored from the get go. I tried to make things interesting and engaging but it felt like they didn't want to be there. Even though I have hit all the LPs in my careers in one way or another and had stories to back it up, my take away from the interview was that basically they want you to tell fake stories with metrics. They have a grading rubric they go by and your stories need to be different for each question for each interview. Even for tell me about your self which was asked 5 times, they want stories to be different. This makes no sense. I was even asking clarification question as I answered to make sure I give them what they wanted. The most hilarious part was tech round. I answered my code line by line and iteration by iteration and the interviewer still wasn't understanding my solution and then said oh we are out of time and I was barely given 10 mins for the whole thing which I completed in 4 mins. I'm certain if I asked the same questions to 4 of the interviewers, they wouldn't be able to give me satisfactory answers using the LPs. Overall, I would say this was most disengaging interview I had with any panel and I have taken and given many interviews. Suggestion for interviewers - focus more on the person and experience as a whole rather than checkboxes on a grading rubric based on LPs which is not one size fits all.