MetLife reviews about "people"

The organization suffered from consistently poor management, marked by unclear direction, inconsistent expectations, and a lack of accountability. Transparency was minimal—key decisions were made without context, and information was routinely withheld from the people doing the actual work. Favoritism was a persistent issue, with certain individuals receiving visibility and access to leadership while those contributing the most were excluded from important meetings, allowing others to take credit for their efforts. The work environment was further undermined by passive‑aggressive communication patterns that discouraged open dialogue and created unnecessary tension. Additionally, there were instances of harassment from one of the executives, which contributed to an unsafe and unprofessional atmosphere.

100% top-down, limited discretion, super corporate culture, a mixture of American and Japan culture in a not so positive sense

Work life balance is difficult during peak season

Heavy caseload The require you to write novels for claims They don't want CMs, they wants drones who all do the same thing, write letters the same way Too much for for the amount they pay

-i have nothing to say here

Slow learning, Manager can be toxic

Low pay compared to others Technology needs improving

new teams that are constantly changing and little direction from leadership

HR is useless. Shared services like marketing and product are absolutely abysmal. Senior leadership changes constantly, making life hellish for employees while Executive leadership remains in tact and keeps cashing their checks. Constant turnover.