Hemorraghing development talent - Senior Software Engineer Paylocity Employee Review

2.0
15 Apr 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Competitive total compensation, assuming 4 full stacks of RSU and stable/growing stock price - Solid benefits package - Phenomenal work/life balance... maybe too good? - Steve is seriously awesome, and would be amazing if not for the middle management ruining his vision

Cons

Historically, Paylocity has been able to attract talent. For a while, they were able to retain it. Unfortunately for the past few years, the trend has been spiraling. First, talent acquisition. Paylocity has repeatedly lowered hiring standards. Historically the motto was "we only hire senior developers," since the company operated with the intent to trust front line delivery with the philosophy of a "collection of startups." When restructuring for titles and career progression, they started hiring mid level engineers. Then they started hiring Associate level. They now have the NCG program, standing for New College Graduates. I would not be surprised if this was the largest source of new hires now. Now, accepting junior talent is actually fine, and a positive thing but only if you have strong guidance and mentorship in place. That's where we get to retention. The company has almost nothing to offer talented developers. They want to feel empowered to solve hard problems, but when you keep hiring green developers to the point you're forming entire teams around brand new employees, you simply can't operate on a model of trust and empowerment. So Paylocity has shifted to a point where frontline developers have practically no significant freedoms. And talented individuals are the ones leaving Paylocity (which takes a lot of courage or competence to leave behind such high TC and benefits). Those with potential that do stay are trending away from competence and towards complacency... just do the minimum to collect RSUs, and enjoy the work/life balance. They're voluntarily stagnating. This culture is not only incapable of training junior developers properly, it's likely ruining their expectations of what a healthy development organization should even be. Even the talented junior developers now have no chance because their guides are hollowed. If you want to feel empowered, challenged, and engaged, run. This is not your employer. If you don't care about career growth, are okay blindly doing what other people tell you to (through RFC, LADR, Tech Practice, etc), and just want great pay and benefits, welcome to Paylocity!

avatar
Paylocity Response
4y
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Throughout the recruiting process, our Talent Acquisition team carefully reviews applicants and conducts interviews to find top talent to join our teams. Our Talent Acquisition team has continued to recruit top talent throughout the pandemic as they partner with leadership teams throughout the business to ensure that they recruit the appropriate talent needed for each opportunity. We also ensure that our new hires are equipped to successfully do their job at Paylocity and are supported along the way. At Paylocity, we take pride in our hiring standards and work to ensure that we’re fostering a healthy environment for all who join Paylocity.

Explore other reviews about Paylocity

5.0
9 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work remote. Fantastic leaders, Definitely a place I have enjoyed working.

Cons

Pay is slightly less than competitors but work life balance and culture make up for it.

2.0
18 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote work remains one of the better aspects of working at Paylocity. The benefits package is solid and includes medical, dental, vision, 401(k), and ESPP offerings. The people are generally good to work with on a personal level, and many employees genuinely care about supporting their teammates and clients. However, experiences can vary significantly depending on the department and leadership team. The product is competitive in the HCM space and offers a broad range of functionality, although it often feels patchwork in certain areas and new releases can introduce unexpected issues that require additional fixes after launch. Having strong relationships with teammates can make the day-to-day experience much better, especially during periods of high workload and constant change.

Cons

The company has changed a lot over the past several years, and a lot of what used to make it a great place to work has slowly been reduced or phased out. Workloads have steadily increased while headcount and support haven’t really kept up. Most teams feel stretched pretty thin, and it’s pretty common to be juggling larger, more complex accounts with the same tools and expectations as before. A lot of the time it feels like you’re trying to keep multiple moving pieces together across both client and internal sides, just to keep things on track. The support structure has also shifted. In the past, team leads were more involved in actually helping remove blockers and getting answers when needed. That’s changed quite a bit, and now it often feels like you’re relying more on peers to figure things out because there isn’t always a clear or fast escalation path. Compensation has been a consistent frustration, especially for long-tenured and high performers. During the 2020–2024 inflation period (roughly 6–9%), many employees still saw sub-3% raises while being reminded to keep overtime down and control costs. It’s hard not to notice the gap between workload going up and pay increases staying pretty flat. In addition, some of the smaller “extras” that used to be part of the culture have been reduced over time. Things like periodic swag, small appreciation gifts, and broader team bonding events have largely gone away for individual contributors in operations. At the same time, there’s a noticeable difference in how different parts of the organization experience engagement, with sales teams still having access to more frequent events, outings, and perks. On top of that, the RSU structure for a lot of senior roles changed in 2024/2025. Stock grants that used to be part of the overall comp package were reduced or moved around, and unless someone hits an “Exceeding” rating (which only a small number of people actually do), the equity piece is pretty limited now. For some people, it effectively feels like a noticeable drop in total comp compared to prior years. Recognition overall is also not what it used to be. There are still people doing a ton of work and driving big results, but the acknowledgment or reward side doesn’t always match the impact. It’s not unusual to see big wins come and go without much formal recognition. The implementation process itself also continues to be a challenge. There can be a strong emphasis on maintaining client satisfaction and perception, sometimes at the expense of firm accountability on the client side during implementation. As a result, it can feel like expectations are not always clearly enforced upfront, and when deliverables slip on the client side, internal teams are often expected to absorb the gap and adjust timelines or outcomes to keep implementations moving forward. There’s also a bit of inconsistency in how things operate internally. Some people seem to have clearer paths and visibility than others, and it can feel like that varies a lot depending on team and relationships. At the same time, sales expectations don’t always line up cleanly with what implementation can realistically deliver, which ends up creating extra pressure when timelines or scope need to be adjusted after the deal is already done. Looking at the longer-term trend, Paylocity used to sit around a 4.2+ rating on Glassdoor years ago, and back then that actually felt accurate. Over the past several years though, sentiment has clearly shifted and the rating has dropped into the low 3s, which lines up with a lot of the changes people have experienced internally. Career growth can also feel a bit unclear depending on the team. Some people move up fine, but for others the path isn’t always obvious or consistent with performance and tenure. Overall, it just feels like more has been expected from employees over time without a matching increase in support, compensation, or recognition, and that’s probably what a lot of the feedback over the past few years is reflecting.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All