Slow, Predictable, Reliable - Principal Software Engineer Northrop Grumman Employee Review

4.0
3 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Amazing WLB - no micromanaging 2. Fireproof - I’ve never even heard of anyone getting fired here and Id expect this is especially true if you have program clearance (SAP) 3. Pay is livable - nothing spectacular but you can live off of it 4. Learning opportunities - You may be able to learn a little from some projects 5. Critical, National Security projects 6. Predictable, reliable leveling comes with YOE

Cons

Lower pay - the pay is much less than the tech industry, otherwise similar to others within industry Boring - I find myself atrophying with my technical aptitude when assigned tasks on projects that are decades old Tenure-based - level is largely based on YOE instead of contribution or ability RTO - I personally have been given projects that are remote and given projects that exist within a SCIF (no phones, no external internet on classified system) and projects within a SCIF can only be worked on-site Red Tape - updating classified software with unclassified software is not going to happen with existing projects, and even for newer projects, it takes a few months to even get it inside to start testing with real data and is usually not realistic for a newer-project timeline Coworker variance - some coworkers enjoy the work, are good at it, and know what they’re doing. Others do not nor do they care.

Explore other reviews about Northrop Grumman

5.0
10 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Love it here. It’s awesome.

Cons

Pay could be more competitive.

1.0
11 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not much pros but talented coworkers.

Cons

I joined expecting a long-term career and initially had a positive experience. Unfortunately, the culture changed significantly after leadership transitions. Micromanagement increased, decision-making became highly centralized, and employee morale steadily declined. Many experienced employees and managers left during my time there, making it difficult to maintain continuity and trust within the organization. The work itself was meaningful, and I had the opportunity to support important projects with talented colleagues. However, recognition, career growth, and employee retention did not appear to receive the same level of attention as process, reporting, and management oversight. My layoff was communicated as unrelated to performance, which was appreciated. However, after years of contribution and institutional knowledge, the overall experience left me feeling that employees were viewed as replaceable rather than valued long-term assets.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All