11y
Thank you for your review. I have to unfortunately disagree with several points that you have made in the cons section.
First of all, there is no management bias - how can there be? Don't we need QAs to run our business - if yes, then we will likely take equal care of them; and we do. There is a dedicated COE for quality assurance led by a VP and a Director. We are looking for very senior folks to hire in the QA track so that we can make it formidable independent practice.
We get a lot of questions about pay scales for QAs. I looked at our hiring data for QA in the last 12 months. We pay significantly above the current pay scales for people we hire in order to align with what our pay scale for QA is. I don't think we do too badly in this area at all. At the same time, we sometimes are driven by the needs of the industry, and so variations in pay scales or onsite opportunities are things that are driven by external factors.
While sometimes it may not seem like it, HR at Nagarro is looking out for employees much more than business units and managers. Some of our key structures are designed to allow this to happen. But, if you have faced a situation differently, then I would like to meet you to understand what happened better.
Yes, we don't have free cabs and meals (they are subsidized though).
I don't think we are ruining anyone's career at all. In fact, Nagarro is probably the best services company to be in at this time. We are growing tremendously and with this growth comes a lot of opportunity.
I recommend that you reach out to me if you would like to have an open discussion and I will be happy to meet you. Once again, thank you for your time.