employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Invisible Technologies

Engaged employer

Remote work perks overshadowed by chaotic leadership and instability - Software Engineer Invisible Technologies Employee Review

1.0
5 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote work - works well if you want to travel while keeping your job, fancy offsites. freedom to build on any tech stack, unlimited tokens, no one's checking.

Cons

Total chaos at the top. No one knows who is in charge. CEO leads with swagger but has failed to delivery on anything meaningful 1 year into role. Has repeatedly made promises that he can't keep. Financials are deplorable. Company is losing money each month. Client deliverables consistently missed. Revenue trending downward each month. No investment in foundations. creating all kinds of tech debt and compliance debt. Two rounds of layoffs in 2026. Clients are sold on tech that's vibe-coded bandaged or a wrapper on SaaS like Databricks. No real tech. Tech leaders can't stand each other. Constant infighting. Non-tech sales and ops leaders calling the shots. Tech makes them insecure. Company projects an image it is not. Don't believe what you see. Ask for the numbers if you are negotiating an offer. You will see for yourself. It's not a tech company. It's a services sweat shop.

Explore other reviews about Invisible Technologies

5.0
11 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Many brilliant motivated minds, some excellent technical elements, promising GTM, good compensation and benefits

Cons

Need clearer focus and goal setting

1
1.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Payments are on time. - Flexible work (you can work according to your schedule).

Cons

I personally wouldn't recommend this position or company to someone else. The projects end very abruptly, often without notice, leaving employees with significant uncertainty and anxiety during the project. Additionally, there's a lack of culture, partially because it's remote and also because of the nature of the projects. They really push for a kumbaya type of cohesion, but it's difficult to achieve given that projects end so abruptly and the turnover rate is so high. Secondly, I've noticed that hiring is often based on whether you're well-liked rather than on your individual merit, how long you've been at the company, or your experience. This is evident in how some of the leadership seems to lack leadership experience. Finally, the pay is fairly low for what the project requires.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All