It's Great Outside but Dead Inside - Software Engineer General Motors (GM) Employee Review

3.0
6 Oct 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Extremely interesting projects and technologies. 2. A lot of learning -- I mean A LOT (but in a good way)! 3. Everyone is forced to act nicely & friendly -- which is good. 4. Overall, it's much better than many other companies -- not because it's up to the expectation bar, but because other companies are much worst in most places of Ireland!

Cons

1. Dreadful and toxic hierarchy. 2. You might very probably find your boss or leader is way less experienced than you. 3. Occasional Robbery: Your team lead might take your work/idea and not give you the credit – it happens. 4. Too many boilerplate meetings. 5. Very difficult to have a good increase in your salary, and the salaries overall are not that great, they're just "okay". 6. A lot of inconvenience and inconsistency in the company protocols and values (they force you to adopt the company values while they don't!). 7. Internally, it's more like: "it's who you know, not what you know” – but that’s not new, it’s rather almost everywhere in Ireland! 8. Promotions are based on the time you spent in the company more than your contributions.

Explore other reviews about General Motors (GM)

5.0
11 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Collaborative, welcoming, transparent, work life balance

Cons

I do not have cons at the moment

3.0
6 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

GM offers above-average benefits compared with many employers, including solid healthcare, retirement, and time-off options. Compensation is generally competitive and aligned with market value, especially for engineering and technical roles. The hybrid work schedule at the Tech Center is a positive, offering better flexibility than fully onsite roles while still allowing collaboration with teams in person.

Cons

GM’s current performance management culture can be a major morale killer. The stacked ranking approach and forced distribution create an environment where employees may feel they are competing against peers instead of being evaluated purely on performance. There also appears to be a cap on how many employees within a group can receive higher performance ratings. A manager may tell you throughout the year that you are exceeding expectations, but the final review can still come back as “meets expectations” because of calibration, quotas, or internal politics. Like many large corporations, it can be easy to feel like a small cog in a very large machine. Decision-making is often driven heavily by cost reduction, investor expectations, and headcount efficiency, sometimes at the expense of morale and long-term employee engagement. The “Workplace of Choice” messaging can feel disconnected from the actual employee experience, especially when performance ranking, headcount reduction, and workload expectations do not align with that message.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All