RUN - Anonymous employee Floify Employee Review

1.0
2 May 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people I work with are fantastic for the most part. Excluding our leadership and operations teams who are disconnected from the entire company overall and continue to make extremely detrimental decisions for the organization.

Cons

Terrible benefits package, looking to retire? ...no 401K match...looking to have a family? RUN our parental leave is sad. Looking to be rewarded for hard work? Not for you! The cool thing here is that when you do good work they pile on more work because no one wants to work here. However, the family favorites will see rewards. The company sees everyone as a little piggie who's lucky to have a job. They don't care about anyone as human beings. The compensation, time off, benefits, and treatment overall reflect their values - which include money for themselves.

avatar
Floify Response
3y
Thank you so much for taking the time to review our company. We are so sorry that you had an unfortunate experience with us. Sometimes the expectations of the position do not align with the candidate's capacity. Please also note that there have been many positive changes recently. Since being acquired, we have had a leadership change, added a parental leave policy, and continue to offer a generous PTO accrual policy of 21 days in addition to paid holidays. Floify also remains one of Built-Ins 2022 50 Best Paying and Best Small Companies to Work for in Colorado."

Explore other reviews about Floify

5.0
11 Nov 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Floify treats their employees and customers with care.

Cons

None really I enjoy working here

2.0
17 Jun 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people on the ground are incredible. They are collaborative, accountable, supportive, and deeply committed to building quality solutions. Peer-to-peer learning here was unmatched. I learned more from my colleagues than in any academic or previous work setting. Remote was helpful for work-life balance.

Cons

Upper management demonstrated no interest in retaining experienced employees. Several key contributors left, and leadership made no meaningful effort to understand or prevent the trend. When legitimate concerns were raised about technical debt, unstable code foundations, or unsustainable product direction, they were dismissed, deflected, or shut down. Leadership showed a clear preference for short-term feature delivery over long-term platform stability. Direct communication about difficult topics was met with avoidance or, worse, retaliation. It took a public emotional breakdown from a team member to finally garner attention from leadership—an unacceptable failure in basic team support. Critical feedback was often treated as inconvenient rather than constructive.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All