employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Alcatel-Lucent

Acquired by Nokia

Engaged employer

Used to be a great company - Anonymous employee Alcatel-Lucent Employee Review

3.0
29 Oct 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great people, at the peak of 2g era the atmosphere was incredible. Large company with lots of opportunity, when available there used to be good pay and good bonuses.

Cons

Chaotic merger between alcatel and lucent resulted in adopting the worst of both rather than the best. Consistent lack of investment in staff both in terms of pay and in training took a long toll. Poor decisions in process management meant every improvement attempt faltered and failed. Too much reliance in low cost regions caused issues for global development

Explore other reviews about Alcatel-Lucent

5.0
12 Jan 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

ALU afforded me many opportunities and the pay was great.

Cons

I can't think of any

2.0
11 Jun 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The workers at Alcatel-Lucent, at least the former Lucent employees since I worked almost exclusively with these folks, were among some of the smartest and most conscientous I ever worked with. The people who tried really cared and carried the company.

Cons

Alcatel brought with it a lot of the classic characteristics of bad French management. ("Why make it simple when we can make it complex?") Lucent has all the characteristics of a former 100-year old monolpoly. Its management is full of managers who never had to be efficient or organized (since it was based on a "cost plus" revenue system while Ma Bell ran the US phone system). In fact, the more people it hired and the more it spent on useless ideas, the more money it made! It has horrible compensation systems for its management and salesforce (paying for sales, not for profits). The company is very badly organized and while some departments are working 60+ hour weeks, others are fairly useless and make it hard for the productive groups to get real, very needed work done. They promote rah-rah cheerleaders into management who have no clue how to manage except to support the people who suck up to them. There is no well-integrated strategy for the company, and this leads to scattershot efforts at doing anything to have a good quarter, even if it means robbing next quarter's sales and profits.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All