Senior On-Site Manager/ Senior Recuiter - Senior Recruiter/On-Site Manager Adecco Employee Review

1.0
11 Jan 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

We had a great office dynamic which is especially hard in the Recruiting world. Benefits were not bad but being that they are the worlds largest staffing agency they could have been better.

Cons

I worked for this company almost 15 years and while I was headed to a work site I was hit and rushed to the emergency department. Not only did I not receive a call from upper management, they denied workman's compensation and to top it off they asked for me to resign!!!! I gave this company my all and I do not regret it and would do it again because that is my work ethic. To this day I am very disheartened that I was treated like this. Absolutely no work life balance. Career opportunity's were given to the "in crowd" luckily I was in. Pay is not within line at all.

Explore other reviews about Adecco

5.0
4 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The team was great to work with

Cons

Could have used an additional recruiter for the time I was there to free up the store manager to meet with more clients

1.0
27 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Onboarding for new hires was smooth

Cons

My experience with Adecco Staffing Agency reflects a significant disconnect between the expectations set during onboarding and the reality of assignment execution. There appears to be a consistent misalignment between candidate skill sets and the roles they are placed into, which not only undermines performance but also creates unnecessary inefficiencies for both the employee and the client organization. Assignments are often presented without full transparency regarding scope, schedule, or operational requirements, resulting in frequent adjustments that disrupt workflow continuity and personal planning. Additionally, there is a notable deficiency in accurate and timely reporting. Communication regarding assignment details, schedule changes, and performance expectations lacks consistency and clarity. This creates ambiguity in accountability and limits the employee’s ability to effectively manage deliverables. From a process standpoint, this reflects weak coordination and insufficient control mechanisms within their staffing and reporting systems. Most concerning is the apparent lack of advocacy for the employee. A staffing agency should function as an intermediary that ensures alignment between employer needs and employee capabilities while also safeguarding fair treatment and clear communication. In this case, there is a perception that employee concerns—particularly those related to schedule changes, workload expectations, and workplace conditions—are not adequately addressed or escalated. This ultimately results in a work environment that feels transactional rather than supportive, with limited consideration for employee well-being or long-term success.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All