After making it through 3 rounds and spending 3 hours in the final onsite interview, it became clear that this “Technician” role was not actually a technician role at all. The position was presented as a hands-on technician job, but the final interview focused almost entirely on engineering-level knowledge and very specific technical experience that was never mentioned in the earlier rounds. If these expectations had been communicated from the beginning, it would have saved a lot of time. Instead, candidates are pushed through multiple rounds only to find out at the end that the company is looking for something completely different. The interviewers were professional, but the hiring process was misleading and poorly managed. Future candidates should ask very clearly what level the role actually is, what technical background is required, and whether the company is really hiring for a technician or an engineer before investing time in the process.