1 Phone Screen with Recruiter, 1 Phone Round with General Manager, 1 Onsite Round with General Manager, 1 Homework/Presentation.
The process was chaotic and the team didn't know how to assess product management skills adequately. It all centered on project background via the usual resume probing. It also required an unusual house visit with one of the founders. The team was very keen on selling a candidate on the company more than understanding the candidate's skills. The team was very sketchy and constantly hid very important details - e.g. how much money they specifically raised, who are the investors, what the real IP is behind the product. Based on where the company is today, it can be seen that a lot of the technology that was demoed at CES was just vaporware. A lot of the product metrics were guarded so don't expect to get any questions about analytical skills on the actual live product since they don't seem to know which are the most important metrics to monitor. The leadership team somehow scammed someone in China to invest, and now they've been trying to bait North American technology leaders to ride the "Bad Blood" wave of A.I. driven technology.
