I applied online. The process took 1 week. I interviewed at Kalles Group (Seattle, WA) in Apr 2025
Interview
The interview process was reasonable through the first two rounds. The job was primarily focused on supporting a client's third-party risk program. I had a lovely interview with the hiring manager, and a reasonable technical interview. I noticed that the lead interviewer during the technical round mostly spoke about themselves, which was odd to me. I was very much impressed by the organization's stated values and the work experience that the org leadership brings to the table, and developed high expectations for transparency and integrity on the org's part as a result. During the technical interview, I was a bit excited and realized after the fact that I may have come on too strong. Still, the organization decided to fill the role being advertised with existing personnel the day after my technical interview, neglected to communicate this to me and instead scheduled me for a follow-up interview with the client account manager. This person waited 15-20 minutes into our call, which he was 10 minutes late to, to share this highly relevant update with me, This development was framed as a decision to move internal personnel who "fit 2/3rds of the requirements" into the role, which indicates to me that they don't regard the role as especially important to get right, despite this allegedly being one of their oldest clients. Alternatively, the statement could also imply I'm an even worse fit than the person they reassigned. I might also add that the client is an extremely well-known global philanthropic entity. He then proceeded to tell me he wanted to have the call because he really wanted to "help me out" somehow because of my "versatility and qualifications." I take my professional track very seriously, and was candid about the fact that I am interested in starting a business of my own in a different field, which the interviewer then capitalized on by casually suggesting he could "broker a meeting" between myself and a friend of his in the industry I'm interested in starting a business in. I left the interview feeling pathetic and like I was some sort of charity case whose circumstances were pitiable. The lack of transparency and integrity, combined with the condescending attitude of the final interviewer and the apparent lack of consideration for truly measuring whether they were providing the best resource they could to a high-value client, makes this organization a hard pass for me.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
They asked about how I would go about performing a third party risk assessment.
I applied online. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Kalles Group (Seattle, WA) in Jul 2022
Interview
The entire interview process was top notch. It is clear that Kalles Group cares for all their candidates. From the job description to the outreach - they have created an inclusive and authentic environment, to help ease the nerves that I am sure candidates (like myself) may have.
The interview process was pretty standard as far as meeting members of the team that the role would have interaction with. In each of those interviews, the individuals showed interest in getting to know me and my experience, while giving great insight into the role and the organization.
Thank you for taking the time to review our interview process and share about your experience! I'm glad to hear that your conversations were positive and authentic; this is validation for our team that we're making progress in the right direction.
We appreciate your interest in Kalles Group and the time you spent getting to know us!
ok, wie jedes andere Gespräch auch. Ist halt ein normales Gespräch und man wird entsprechend seinen Qualifikationen gefragt und warum man hier arbeiten möchte. War ein gutes Gespräch ohne Stress oder anderen außergewöhnlichen Situationen. Jeder sieht das natürlich anders