InfoCepts interview questions

process of interview is accurated, clients are not consistent. Hr discussion is like tech round. tech round is like Hr. They are not doing their jobs perfect. Better exclude the process of interview.

"Interview process used for free consulting on active projects" Ordeal experience: I interviewed for a Senior Architect (Analytics - BI) position. While the JD was heavily focused on Data & Analytics, the interview process felt less like a skill assessment and more like a "work-for-free" session. I was tasked with a case study involving actual client challenges faced by a current project/account. I prepared a client-facing presentation and presented it to the delivery team, who used the session to have their project doubts cleared. After providing actionable solutions to their real-time project issues, I was rejected with the excuse that I "lacked AI experience"—a requirement that was not emphasized in the JD nor relevant to the specific data architecture challenges presented in the case study. Advice to Management: Stop using the interview process to crowdsource solutions for your delivery teams. It is highly unethical to use a candidate’s 20+ years of expertise to solve active project hurdles under the guise of an interview, only to move the goalposts at the final stage.