The technical test was not at all as described. It was testing my knowledge on a very specific Java function. One that is not mentioned in your job spec as essential or in your email. The interviewer informed me I couldn't use the internet to look up the specific functions. So you may as well ask me in my screening interview if I can remember how to write Java code for this specific case off the top of my head. I'd say 'No' and we would all of saved some time. They also were not paying attention and on several occasions didn't answer my questions There were no questions or tests on general Java concepts or Testing. In no way were my skills as an SDET tested. In my opinion I was not given a fair chance nor treated with respect.

Introductions, a bit about the company and then some questions, followed by a coding task. The process was not one that can identify candidate skills rather one that points out their flaws and tests their recall of text book questions. It is a very negative way in which to conduct interviews and it is no surprise why it takes this company so long to hire and retain roles of this nature. The white board section is random and not very well thought out. Literally a few squares on what looked like MS Paint, with letters representing API, DB and UI. The questions are vague and don’t really make any sense. The coding task is reasonable but, you will be ‘marked’ incredibly harshly. My advice would be to implement it as if it was going live however, you will only have 30 minutes to complete it with literally no help. It is not a pairing exercise. Also, learn Java Streams, this is what they want to see. The interviewer was arrogant, inconsiderate and unprofessional. As a representative for the company, they did a poor job and displayed none of the cultural values they talked about.