I felt somewhat uncomfortable with the one-way interview format, as I would have preferred to speak with a real person who could take the time to assess candidates more carefully and create a more natural exchange. The process felt quite impersonal, which made it harder to show personality and communicate in a genuine way.
The only positive aspect, in my opinion, was that the platform allowed one extra attempt for some video answers if the first recording was not satisfactory. That made the experience slightly less stressful.
On the other hand, I did appreciate the fact that they later provided an outcome instead of simply disappearing, which unfortunately has become increasingly rare in recruitment processes today.
First, there is an online interview tool, followed by actual human led discussions.
The online platform benefits only the employer, not the candidates. In my opinion, the interview process should be designed for both sides, allowing candidates to ask questions, interact, and determine whether the opportunity is a good fit for them. This was not the case here. Using a one-way recruitment platform serves only the employer.
Additionally, while AISTS emphasises that they welcome all applications and encourage a diverse range of candidates, in practice, prior experience in the sports environment is a must. Without it, candidates have no chance.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Tell us about yourself.
What is your salary expectation.
What scares you about the job offer.
I applied online. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at AISTS in Sept 2023
Interview
Two in total: 1st one = Remote interview recording yourself answering questions; 2nd = F2F with director & HR, then another with part of rest of team - all on-site
