Workera Reviews

4.1

65% would recommend to a friend

(21 total reviews)
avatar

Kian Katanforoosh

84% approve of CEO

63% positive business outlook

Workera has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 21 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Workera employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

21 reviews
2.0
14 Sept 2023

Disorganized, poor leadership

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It's a start up, so you get to have your hands in a lot of different projects and activities that you wouldn't necessarily be exposed to at a larger company. You can learn a lot in that respect and it's a good resume builder. Most of the people are nice and good to work with. I was paid well.

Cons

The CEO has no business leading the business. He's a very smart individual, who excels in academia and engineering, but he has no clue how to successfully run and scale a business. He needs to step down as CEO and bring in someone more experienced in that area if he wants any chance of the company being successful. He's a terrible people manager who gives no feedback and doesn't set clear expectations. (at least on the non-engineering side of things) The Chief Sales Officer is extremely difficult to work with and everyone has problems with him. The CEO gives him too much deference and influence. His sales team consistently underperforms, yet it's the individual sales people that get fired instead of him. It's time for him to go. In general, though they promote a culture of lifelong learning, they don't set anyone up to succeed and don't give you the change to actually learn and grow in your role. They just fire people left and right. I've never seen such a high percentage of a workforce fired in my life.

1.0
13 Sept 2023

Toxic Leadership

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote, decent pay, AI-focused tech & strong engineering teams. There truly are some brilliant people at the company once you look under the hood but unfortunately, with the lack of quality leadership, none are set up for success. It is a start-up so it is what you make of it - not for someone who needs a lot of structure in their day

Cons

Very toxic remote work culture promoted by first-time executives across their leadership team. CEO, Ops, Finance & Product live on the west coast of the US (PST) with a +7/8 hour difference to the Sales, Marketing & Engineering leads who live across the EU (UTC). This creates a significant amount of internal disconnect, miscommunication, and unresponsiveness forcing mid-level workers to be online around the clock. There is little to no KPI structure so top performers will continue to be overlooked until this is solidified. You will likely see a more senior role open up on your team before getting a nod at promotion so I'd highly suggest negotiating the highest possible salary.

3.0
22 Apr 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Nice people! Everyone who was there a long time believed in the mission and vision. I went to multiple offsite events that were fun and functional because of the people. -The company had a high tolerance for change and very quickly pivoted when the market demanded it. Whether those pivots were successful was another thing. -I started pre-series A and had a lot of freedom early on to define my role. Work-life balance is only good if you REALLY enforce it for yourself, No one will enforce it for you, especially since communications and decisions are happening at all hours of the day with a global team. In general people at Workera were pretty good about understanding when someone didn't respond outside their working hours. -I got to help build Workera's proprietary assessment development platform with a delightful and extremely competent group of engineers. The process was long convoluted, but it was exciting and gratifying to see my wish list of requirements become a reality over the course of months and years. -Pay was good for my role

Cons

-SLT put a big emphasis on making things 'look' cutting edge, pretty, and minimally functional with little to no understanding of what it takes to create this on the backend. Both engineering and content teams were constantly at odds with SLT on this. -Later on, zero interest in correctly/responsibly doing assessment, even though that's supposedly what Workera is all about. Just before I left Workera, a colleague started a doomed initiative to inform SLT what 'validity' means in the context of measurement in the hopes that we could get some buy-in to slow down a little and improve the (poor, very poor) quality of our assessments. After a bit of lip service to validity, SLT blew this off. -The company laid off all psychometric staff in April 2024 and eliminated their positions entirely because someone in SLT had a half-baked idea for scoring that they did not properly communicate with any of the I/O / data science people left on staff. -There was huge pressure for assessment developers to "just generate" all assessment content at a rate where the content couldn't all be verified by a human to be accurate. We dealt with extremely poor morale and a lot of burnout because of the pressure to create content at an unsustainable volume and speed. -We hired assessment/learning developers exclusively from the Middle East and Asia as contract employees, solely for cost reasons. They were/are a delightful, highly educated, and whip-smart group of people who were criminally underpaid and 'othered' by the company in spite of many of them working there for 3+ years. In a conversation with HR about a potential renewal pay increase for one multi-year AD located in south Asia from around $18/hr to $20/hr, the HR person I was speaking with said that we hired this AD before we did benchmarking and realized that a comparable role in Bangladesh would only be making about $7.69 per hour, therefore we would never give this person a raise regardless of their merit since they are already being overpaid. This sort of business-over-people mentality began to appear around late 2023 and I just didn't like it. -More petty: an FTE who I supervised was laid off in a team restructure. I wasn't informed about it until after he'd already been laid off. I felt undermined as a manager and ashamed that I wasn't the one to break the news to him. This event was the beginning of the end for me at Workera, though it took me about 7 more months to actually resign. -There's a lot more to add here but it ultimately amounts to Workera's intense drive to change all the time to fit the demands of their clients without really thinking of whether they're making a product that is useful to any of the individuals who would be induced to use it.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 21 Reviews

Glassdoor has 25 Workera reviews submitted anonymously by Workera employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Workera is right for you.