employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Videojet Technologies

Part of Veralto

Engaged employer

Videojet Technologies Reviews

3.1

3% would recommend to a friend

(245 total reviews)
avatar

Tom Siller

Not enough data to show CEO approval

3% positive business outlook

Videojet Technologies has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 245 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Videojet Technologies employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufacturing industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

245 reviews
2.0
6 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

“Unlimited “ pto if only you get an approval from your manager, even then they can tell you to cancel your plans because there is “an important meeting”

Cons

Advancement is often discussed but rarely delivered. Throughout my time there, promotions were frequently mentioned as future opportunities, yet in practice there was always a reason to delay or deny them. Even when moving into new roles, salary increases were minimal—typically around 10%—which did not reflect the level of responsibility or contribution. Compensation overall felt uncompetitive. I am aware of colleagues who needed to take on additional work to meet basic expenses, while leadership incentives and bonuses remained strong. This created a noticeable disconnect between employee experience and management priorities. One of the most disappointing aspects was the lack of internal growth opportunities. Instead of promoting employees who already understand the business and its operations, the company often chose to hire externally. This made it difficult to see a clear long-term career path within the organization. Additionally, there seemed to be little focus on employee retention or feedback. Since leaving, I have joined a competitor who recognized and valued my experience at Videojet, offering significantly better compensation—nearly double—and stronger growth opportunities. My background and understanding of the industry have allowed me to make an immediate impact in my new role. Notably, no exit interview or feedback process was conducted when I left, which reinforced my impression that employee perspectives are not a priority for the company. Leaving was ultimately the right decision

4.0
8 Mar 2026

Review till now

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Salary structure is decent enough. Leaves and perks are good. Specially for me and my team our manager is good. He try to put less pressure on us whatever he gets from the top management.

Cons

Some of the decision from the higher managemnet is qutionable. Feels like the lack clarity.

2.0
26 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Unlimited pto which I am using to the last second

Cons

I joined 4 years ago and initially had a positive experience. Over time, I significantly expanded my skills and consistently delivered on my responsibilities, including taking ownership of additional work during team transitions and creating detailed documentation to support continuity and continuous improvement. The challenges began during a period of restructuring. After leadership changes, a peer at my same level was informally placed in a supervisory role over my work. The rationale and criteria for this decision were never clearly communicated, which created confusion around authority, expectations, and career progression. Luckily, he eventually left, which provided more space to work independently without micromanagement. Subsequently, new leadership was brought in to oversee the team. In practice, there appeared to be limited understanding of the distinct responsibilities across roles within the group. Several times I had to explain my role and clarify the extra duties I had taken on after a teammate’s departure. This made it difficult to align expectations and added unnecessary friction to workflow. For a technical team, stronger domain familiarity at the management level is essential for effective leadership. More broadly, advancement appeared to depend heavily on internal visibility and relationships rather than clearly defined, performance-based criteria. Despite absorbing additional responsibilities and raising the topic of growth multiple times, there was no transparent path forward. One particularly concerning cultural signal occurred just a few months ago after what the company calls “anonymous reviews.” A long-tenured employee who had expressed critical feedback about upper management was separated from the company shortly thereafter. While I was not directly involved, the sequence of events had a noticeable impact on team morale and psychological safety. To this day, my responsibilities continue to expand without corresponding title or compensation alignment. Combined with ongoing concerns about transparency and psychological safety, this has significantly impacted my long-term outlook with the company. In particular, the handling of employee feedback created hesitation around speaking openly. When an organization promotes a “safe” and “anonymous” environment, employees need to trust that commitment in practice. Based on what I observed, that trust is difficult to maintain. As a result, I have begun exploring opportunities in organizations that more clearly align performance, recognition, and employee trust.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 245 Reviews

Glassdoor has 535 Videojet Technologies reviews submitted anonymously by Videojet Technologies employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Videojet Technologies is right for you.