Partners Group Reviews

3.4

48% would recommend to a friend

(475 total reviews)

David Layton

59% approve of CEO

51% positive business outlook

Partners Group has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 475 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Partners Group employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Finance industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

475 reviews
1.0
31 Mar 2019

Horrible Place / HIGH Turnover

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Absolutely no positives that I can think of. I have made a horrible mistake accepting a position with Partners Group.

Cons

1. There is a reason Partners Group has a 2.6 Glassdoor rating (based on over 150 reviews). You would not stay in a hotel room with a 2.6 rating - why would you accept a position at a firm with such a low score? This is your career and livelihood. 2. The recent positive reviews on Glassdoor are fake and written by HR. In Q4 2018, the management team held a firm-wide forum to discuss the firm's low Glassdoor rating (which at that time was 2.4) and asked employees to write fake reviews. 3. Avoid these toxic groups - IVC, Real Estate, Private Debt. TOXIC LEADERSHIP. They come across as friendly people in interviews but that's because they have trouble recruiting people. Extremely political, UNPROFESSIONAL environment … not team players. These groups' leaders are deceitful liars. After working in these groups for 2 months, you will see what it's really like. This is the first firm that I have worked at where group heads and MDs verbally abuse associates. Rather than training or mentoring new associates, MDs throw new hires under the bus to cover their own behinds. These groups also have the highest turnover. Avoid these groups if you're looking for a long term career, development and mentorship. 4. Untrained, inexperienced co-workers. The firm is filled with people who are not qualified to do their jobs. Think about it … who in NYC finance would take a job in Denver for half the comp? Basically the industry's rejects. So hours can extend late into the night because you spend your entire day training your peers and junior co-workers on tasks that bulge bracket summer analysts breeze through. Oh … and your untrained workers think they know everything, so have fun training. Entitled millennials 5. Deal teams do limited diligence on investments because most of the time is spent formatting and adhering to internal procedures. You spend your day copying and pasting. I seriously have not learned a single thing here, except how to use Siebel (PG's internal database system that keeps on crashing because the IT team is 3 people) and other non-transferrable skills. 6. Low comp … This is not even the worst reason, but read your offer letter carefully because the Denver HR team is seriously incompetent (no joke). The short summary is that you're basically working for cash comp is that half the market rate. The equity comp is minimal and has 3-5 year vesting. Any carry that you receive is worthless unless you stay over 5 years and agree to sign a two year non-compete if you ever decide to leave. 7. No one respects the firm's founders or leadership. It's not uncommon to hear people call the founders and other senior management team members idiots behind closed doors. The management team and group heads are not visionaries and command no respect internally. How can you keep a firm alive with no vision or respect? 8. HIGH TURNOVER … Seriously one of the highest turnover rates that I have seen or heard about in the finance industry. Everyone competent leaves, so the morons who are willing to work for half the market pay remain.

1.0
26 May 2018

Vice President

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I know this is the “Pro” section, but I had such a negative experience at Partners Group that I wanted to use this space to express my deep concerns for the well being of current and future employers and wish people to keep their careers as far away from PG as possible.

Cons

• Pay is shameful • Swiss are condescending and cultish • Mobility is nonexistent as the focus is on laterals • Communication is so bad, it hurts deals and the employees lifestyle • the firm nickel-and-dimes their employees every chance they get • compensation is so convoluted and basically locks you into working with the firm for life, unless you want to sacrifice all the carry you’ve ever made • the environment is so cut throat because promotions are so rare and arbitrary • no one will help you with a deal because people want to see you fail

1.0
2 Jun 2019

Partners Group - stay away from this company

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Used to be a good place to work when the firm had between 200 and 500 employees

Cons

Base salary is significantly lower than the industry average since Partners Group operates at a 65% EBITDA margin, whereas competitors have an EBITDA margin of between 30% and 45%. Consequently, salaries are low. An AVP has a base salary between CHF 105-115k, a VP between CHF 120-142k, a SVP between CHF 150-170k and an MD has a base salary of only CHF 200k. Cash bonus: Cash bonus is also low compared to industry standards. In Switzerland you even need to pay taxes on the restricted equity employee programs at the time of allocation, which results in very low cash bonuses. In case you receive a base salary increase, your cash bonus will be cut by the same amount in the next year. Effectively you don’t have an increase. Management tells you then that it looks at total compensation. Equity incentive program: Partners Group employees receive shares in Partners Group Holding AG. However, the shares are locked up for several years, with a linear vesting of 20% per year. For instance, if you receive a bonus of CHF 50k p.a. over a period of 5 years (in total CHF 250k), you are only entitled to CHF 150k because the remaining shares are still restricted. This means that you lose 40% of your share entitlement over a 5 year horizon if you leave the firm. It is a rolling process and the employee always loses and the “bank” always wins. Carry: First and foremost, 65% of carried interest goes to Partners Group Holding AG (the listed management company). Partners Group employees receive carried interest from Vice President level. However, the carried interest only vests over time with a linear vesting of 20% per year. For instance, if you receive a carried interest dollars of CHF 100k p.a. over a period of 5 years (in total CHF 500k), you are only entitled to CHF 300k because the remaining carry is still restricted. This means that you lose 40% of your carry entitlement over a 5 year horizon if you leave the firm. In addition, there is a 2 year non-compete clause. In case you join a competing firm, you lose everything. It is a rolling process and the employee always loses and the “bank” always wins. Employees are squeezed like lemons and, to salve their conscience, the founders make occasionally smaller donations to welfare organization. Partners Group employs 1.200 employees globally and has permanently around 120 open positions on its website. Personnel turnover is very high due to (1) low compensation, (2) incompetent management coupled with (3) extremely high expectations for which employees are not adequately compensated. Discrimination: Horrible pay compared to similar asset managers. Very little chance of promotion beyond Vice President level if you are not Swiss or work in sales. The firm keeps increasing promotion timelines and has made it almost impossible to get carried interest. The firm keeps making very large special allocations/distributions to senior management, but refuses to share anything with non-senior employees that ultimately keep the firm. Partners Group only promotes Swiss nationals to business unit heads in Switzerland, with the exception of sales people. The firm claims that it is responsible for the dreams of beneficiaries. In reality, however, the only story about Partners Group is asset gathering so that the founders and senior management are able to pay large dividends to themselves. Conclusion: Therefore, never ever join Partners Group. Management´s only objective is to boost the share price and increase dividends. Since less than 20 people – including former and retired partners – own more than 40% of the outstanding share capital, the only objective is to make them even wealthier and exploit employees with low salaries and restricted compensation. Before the IPO in March 2006, Partners Group was a small shop having difficulties attracting qualified employees. The vast majority of your compensation was equity options and from 2008 onwards equity options and shares of Partners Group. It only mattered when you joined the firm (how many equity options and equity you got). Forget the big and shining brand that Partners Group is today. Many seniors that have joined before the IPO are retiring or have already retired because the stock rose twelve-fold since the IPO in 2006 (from CHF 63 to CHF 750 per share) and made many of them multi-millionaires ranging between CHF 20m and CHF 500m. It was the equity story Partners Group. To conclude, never ever consider even applying at Partners Group. Do stay away from this company!!!!!

Viewing 1 - 3 of 475 Reviews

Glassdoor has 567 Partners Group reviews submitted anonymously by Partners Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Partners Group is right for you.