Jacobson/Rost Reviews

2.9

53% would recommend to a friend

(46 total reviews)

52% positive business outlook

Jacobson/Rost has an employee rating of 2.9 out of 5 stars, based on 46 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Jacobson/Rost employee rating is 22% below average for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

46 reviews
2.0
20 Dec 2016

Consider if you're an entry level employee

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Jacobson Rost has had many hard-working employees on every level who strive to do and create really good work, which the agency has proven they are capable of delivering on several occasions and for clients and budgets ranging from small to big. It is democratic in that sense, if you can do it, you get to do it, which is a huge positive for young, hungry ad professionals and certainly not the case everywhere. They do have legitimately good work on their reel and surprisingly young people behind some of it. Over the years, they have definitely had good people inside the building and good people as creative partners to get the work done. That said, if you're there to hustle and get stuff done as a young, hungry employee, be smart about it and have a 12-24 month plan.

Cons

Lack of involvement in the local ad community. (Huge negative for the young, hungry people they hope to attract.) Lack of unified vision for the company long-term. Extremely high turnover. Employees often have lists going of how many people have quit during their time. Not unusual to have 25+ for just a year or two of work. No actual company culture. “Culture” and climate change from project to project, team to team. Some are very tight, full of people who are self-starters and would have a great cultural experience anywhere. Others seem to have failure to launch in that regard. No transparency when it comes to a lot of company policies. No consensus from management on setting goals and possible rewards for employees. There is never a real “if you accomplish X, you get Y” expectation even when you push to have that conversation and clarify for yourself. All promotions, title changes, bonuses, etc. feel totally random, even when you are a person who specifically asks for this information and for these conversations. Someone can do the same thing as you and get a totally different response, especially because upper management tends to be reactive and not proactive. It can be tough to navigate. Terrible benefits. Work/Life balance is generally awful. In fact, awful is the norm. At another agency I’ve worked with they warned me initially, “Sometimes people have to stay late... to 7PM even.” I laughed out loud. JR employees regularly stay past 10pm. Regularly. Everyone has stories of working to 2am or later. Oh, and no you never get any comp days or additional benefits for that type of work. It is expected. It is expected to be available to them on your days off and on your vacations or PTO time. JR can cut into your time relentlessly and without penalty but you can never cut into JR time. HA of course not. Even leaving for a Drs appointment is a hassle. If you come in late for safety issues or taking a kid to school, you are marked down in a "late book." I have worked for MUCH bigger clients with MUCH higher stakes and budgets with much longer deadlines and more understanding. There is no reason for it other than ineffective management and unrealistic promises to clients. On the director level, it is hit or miss on who you learn from. Some are fantastic people who can genuinely help you in your career. Others were simply "there long enough" and were promoted because of it, despite a lack of actual managerial or leadership skills. That does not seem to be a priority. HR/upper management treats its employees like they’re constantly in trouble or like they are kids trying to skip school, which gets exhausting when you’re actually an employed adult trying to do great work. (Jerry Flema is the type who would rather spy on employees than reward them for work well done, which feels backwards in an industry where creative thought, creative ideas and so therefore creative people are ultimately your currency.)

1.0
20 Mar 2018

Fake Reviews, Fake Company - Trust your insticts

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

This company could have a lot going for it, there are some talented people and there must be something they are doing that attracts great, younger people to it. However, that's where it ends. You soon find out that it's got a mean, hard edge underneath. The partners are at war with eachother. The MKE office hates the Chicago office. There are serious conflicts about how to actually run the business, none of which the management lets anyone in senior roles in on. The juniors are treated like dirt, except when they are hounded to the point of breaking for extra demands the client didn't ask for. There's a paranoia that nothing is good enough - because the leadership brings their own insecurity into everything. If you are young and hungry, and are ready to enter the meat grinder then this is a good place to spend a year getting a lot of experience, and learning what not to do. But any other situation you will regret it and hate your life.

Cons

The downsides are that they believe company culture is something they can create by buying beer occasionally for people, but on your own credit card and maybe they will pay you back. They over promise, which of course happens industry-wide, but in this case there is no way to make the ends meet, yet you're told it's fine and that somehow it magically will sort itself out. There is zero trust from the leadership, which then in turn makes the entire office not trust anyone. We're all adults here. If you are wondering why there are good reviews it's because the old school folks are forced to write them in response to the real reviews.

1.0
6 Dec 2016

This is not normal

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They buy fruit once a week for the office and there's a coffee machine for free. There's also a vending machine they keep stocked for when you feel like springing $1 for a .89 cent bag of M&M's. And given how active management has been in giving themselves 4 and 5 star reviews on this site, one could argue that they take an active interest in what their employees have to say.

Cons

First of all, this agency isn't really a traditional creative agency. Creative thinking and the proverbial "Big Ideas" aren't in JR's wheelhouse. We like safe work. If it's been done before by another brand and upper management can tell the client it's a safe bet, that's what we go with. What results is everything looking the same across the board. I was all set to write a lengthy, detailed review of this place but it looks like everything I find objectionable has already been brought up. Here are the key take-aways: No creative collaboration "Agency is led by marketing and account people who see creatives as "hands" to make the work they dictate." So much truth in that statement. Going in they really talk up how many "cool brands" they have for their creatives to work on, but in reality it's mostly the piecemeal, below the line and retail work that won't help you keep building your portfolio with interesting work. In addition to that, they actively discourage creative pairings and collaboration. New business pitches and new campaign work is dictated primarily by a couple of the partners (one of whom's creative approach reminds me of Fred Willard's character in 'A Mighty Wind.' Seriously- pure hack and cliche riddled ideas.) One of the ADs who used to work here actually asked if she could concept on new biz and was told by the CD she spoke to, "Our creatives aren't really good at that." High turnover "Under appreciated, overworked, under paid, lack of respect for employees and skill sets, lack of overall investment of employees." Yup. They have an extremely hard time retaining talent mostly because they don't know how to balance their workload. Where most creative agencies have a creative resources manager whose sole function is to efficiently allocate resources, JR takes a "DROP EVERYTHING AND DO THIS NOW" approach to the work. Looking at the reviews management has left on this site, they seem to think of this as a "pick it up and run with it" approach. That's not what that is. What happens is the office ends up with is 2-3 creatives at any given time with too much on their plate, and the rest with not a whole lot to do. No culture Agency life and culture are what make the long hours and crap pay worth it. This agency has no culture. Since culture comes from the people, I suspect the high turnover rate has a lot to do with this problem. There are a handful of people who make showing up to the office not completely unbearable, but the minute they realize their worth and take it elsewhere, they'll take whatever scrap of culture the office might have hoped for with them. Low pay If you're reading this review, then you know how easy it is to look up and compare salaries in your particular field. For the most part, JR pays its Jrs a ridiculously low salary. About $6-$8k less than the industry average. Low to mid 30k range. This is not a normal office. There are a lot of ills and it's a pretty toxic place.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 46 Reviews

Glassdoor has 51 Jacobson/Rost reviews submitted anonymously by Jacobson/Rost employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Jacobson/Rost is right for you.