Global Sources Reviews

3.3

51% would recommend to a friend

(98 total reviews)

Hu Wei

81% approve of CEO

51% positive business outlook

Global Sources has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 98 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Global Sources employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

98 reviews
1.0
11 Dec 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I belong to the editorial and creative side of things, and at least we get to go home on time. The salespeople aren't half as lucky. If anyone would enjoy working here, it's the stability and predictability of things. What attracted me here was a good raise and promotion from my previous job, but what I didn't count on was a drastic downside in its corporate culture.

Cons

If you are an editorial or creative professional, and want to be with a firm that respects you as an individual, stay far away. This company is comprised of salesmen and programmers who think they know better than you, and will meddle in every scrap of work you do. They have no respect of all creative people, simply because they think by being in a 'support role', creative must be subordinate to the opinions of everyone else. I lost count of the number of times some senior manager alters my idea with his stupid, uninformed judgment, and I waste so much time explaining the fundamentals of design to these people. In the end I still lose the argument. ie: their way or the highway. And it shows in all the material they produce. Even more biting is how if there is a dispute, management will side with the businesspeople, even if they're 20-year-old fresh college grads. Your 20 years' industry experience cannot trump their zero years' working and creative experience. This leads me to comment on the rampant nepotism and ball-polishing you need to do to get ahead here. The founder the CEO, Merl Hinrichs, is also chairman of the BOD. Classic conflict of interest case. You know how that will lead to. Mr Hinrichs also runs a certain Thunderbird Business School, and places graduates from this private school straight into top management. Even in the formal performance appraisal process, you're going to lose out even if you're an accomplished creative professional. No one knows how to judge your design/editorial ability, so they use factors like punctuality, obedience to company rules, and conforming to corporate design standards to judge you. Only those who think like Merl, and worship his ways of doing things, can get ahead. Above all that, this company still adheres to a corporate culture of the old industrial era. Your online surfing is monitored. Your timings for arrival and departure from office is scrutinised. Everyone is de-motivated. The office is quiet as a tomb. You are not allowed to say anything against company policy. I was brutally berated once for saying a certain company slogan isn't the best term we can think of, in a closed staff meeting. Welcome to North Korea! I've never been in a place so de-humanising, petty, and devoid of basic business sense. I hear it's far worse in their mainland China branches. Staff are required to bow to senior management every morning, Japanese ritual style. If you're not in office at 8.30am SHARP, your boss' pay get deducted. During the Chinese New Year, staff are made to return to work in the weekend, to make up for the holiday weekdays off.

1.0
7 Jan 2021

Waste of time

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A loud voice doesn’t make you smart

Cons

Hard to say, let’s start with: Incompetent management focused on who yells loudest Loyalty based on giving advice on how your life is much better having them around Petty stupid ideals that mean nothing Useless political games (having a Degree in the WRONG role hired for) Bullying others to show that you can do a role based on a demoted title Poor self confidence as a leader, picking on others to show off is a sign of bullying and harassment, not strong leadership Divide and conquer is a poor way to show leadership Blaming the previous team to hide incompetence shows stupidity Claiming that true leaders with real experience as “Googling answers” shows you can’t understand true experience (FYI, you did the same and left it on screen when sharing your screen! Pathetic) Isolationist behaviour makes people question you behind your back, if they haven’t done it in front of your face.

2.0
23 Aug 2015

No appreciation of junior to middle level staff's efforts

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Big company, systematic workflow and clear structure. no OT culture

Cons

Looooong reporting line and not efficient at all. Invisible red tapes and multiple management lines which you have to satisfy all. Lack of appreciation of junior to middle level staff's efforts, never listen to the front line staff's voice. Below the market salary, no benefits at all (no medical insurance), and bad work location. Not suitable for a career hiker.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 98 Reviews

Glassdoor has 108 Global Sources reviews submitted anonymously by Global Sources employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Global Sources is right for you.