Dinosaurs ignoring the incoming meteor - Engineer Victaulic Employee Review

1.0
1 Sept 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nice cafeteria with reasonable prices

Cons

Victaulic is run by a sea of old white men who think they're helming a company in the 1950s. Employees wear ties every day to sit butts-in-seats in cubicles with nary a customer in sight. Sales rules all, so any request that comes in from a salesperson requires immediate fulfillment, no matter how ridiculous, inappropriate, or expensive. Hurricane, blizzard, pandemic that killed your relatives? Too bad, so sad, get to the office ASAP. Sexual harassment is ignored, but they're quick to find a handful of attractive women in engineering to trot out for photo ops in trade journals (who go on record about how equitable the company is, before quickly leaving for other companies). Managers muse about how they have a problem retaining women, but just can't seem to put a finger on why. Anyone hired before 2006 is in the pension, and their non-competitive salaries are used to justify depressing the salaries of new hires (who are NOT eligible for the pension). "Innovation" is the buzz word that justifies everything: we need in-person employee interactions to foster innovation (and that's why you're risking your life coming into the office during Covid). Strange how the pay, benefits, business practices, and workplace attitudes all completely lack this "innovation".

Explore other reviews about Victaulic

5.0
5 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great culture, expanding fast, great industry

Cons

Not enough space for employees because of rapid growth

2.0
13 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company has strong industry recognition and there are opportunities to gain experience across many areas of the business. I worked with some genuinely talented people and learned a lot about navigating complex organizations, managing stakeholders, and operating within a large corporate environment.

Cons

The environment became increasingly difficult to work in over time. Internal politics and excessive oversight often outweighed efficiency or expertise, making it hard to move initiatives forward. There was a persistent “too many hands in the pot” problem where too many stakeholders influenced projects without clear ownership or accountability. Roles and responsibilities were often unclear or not respected, which created confusion, duplicated work, bottlenecks, and tension between teams. Because of this, many projects operated on unnecessarily long timelines and often became reactive rather than strategic. Work frequently stalled due to internal holdups, shifting priorities, or lack of alignment, resulting in rushed execution later on with little long-term planning or foresight. It often felt nearly impossible to effectively do the job I was hired for because so much time was spent navigating politics, defending decisions, chasing approvals, and managing conflicting stakeholder opinions rather than actually executing meaningful work. Despite being hired for a specific area of expertise, key decisions were frequently overridden by people outside that expertise, often resulting in reactive, watered-down work that lacked strategy, consistency, or clear direction. In many cases, work was pushed out that I genuinely would not have put my name on, but there was little ability to challenge or change decisions once internal dynamics took over. Compensation and growth opportunities also felt well below market value, especially considering the workload and expectations. Even when market research and compensation benchmarks were brought forward to support these concerns, there appeared to be little willingness or ability from leadership to meaningfully address them.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All