Verisk a company which care about employees - Senior QA Automation Engineer Verisk Employee Review

5.0
3 Jan 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

35 hours per week 2 days of Health and Wells being per year Buddy programme Benefits And in my personal opinion the best is respect for the work done, care of the employees looking for the best in profesional and personal life

Cons

As an international company with several divisions and Business Units in several countries align all of them, it is a hard work to be done

avatar
Verisk Response
1y
Hello, thanks for sending us your insights. We appreciate your feedback and are delighted to hear about your positive experience working with us. We are glad you are happy with your compensation and benefits package, and specifically our additional well-being days in the holiday calendar. We consistently review our compensation levels for market competitiveness and alignment with our pay-for-performance philosophy. At Verisk, we believe it is important to continue to invest in our benefits packages, employee resources, and training and development to support the needs of our team members.

Explore other reviews about Verisk

5.0
30 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Cons

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2.0
30 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Cons

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All