Sketchy company that is bound to fail because of their values - Anonymous Snappr Employee Review

1.0
27 Oct 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

HMO is the only good thing about this company.

Cons

1. There is no actual career opportunity and growth. 2. Hiring process and New Hire Contract is very sketchy and violates a lot of DOLE law, especially with their termination and retrenchment whims. 3. There is no probational contract to protect you from being terminated. 4. No effort from leadership and management to actually safeguard employees. You'll feel always on the edge of your seat while you're at Snappr. 5. They're just another corporate company that will only see people as numbers.

Explore other reviews about Snappr

5.0
5 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Opportunities to improve editing skills and speed while still maintaining consistency across projects. Wide variety of editing work that doesn’t sacrifice creativity. Exploring different styles instead of repetitive editing assignments every day. Managers expecting accountability while still giving editors room to handle projects independently.

Cons

The volume of work can be overwhelming sometimes.

1.0
20 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good learning opportunities and some personal development opportunities.

Cons

This is not a good place if you actually care about your work or your projects. Leadership says all the right things in meetings, then immediately makes decisions that leave people confused, exhausted, and constantly questioning what changed overnight. If strong performers can be pushed aside so easily, it makes it hard to trust anything about job security or fairness. The CEO is visible when it comes to speeches and appearances, but when employees need clarity, support, or real direction, everything goes silent. The entire environment became extremely stressful because no one ever felt secure, and most people were just trying to avoid being next in line. Some contracts and policy decisions appeared outright unethical, and several conversations involved people comparing notes just to confirm what was really happening.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All