Nice, diverse working environment. - Anonymous employee Sirris Employee Review

5.0
19 Jul 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Large variety in Research and Innovation projects. A lot of freedom to work and improve. Good work-life balance, flexible hours to manage personal life.

Cons

No company car below senior level.

Explore other reviews about Sirris

2.0
23 Feb 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Sirris is an unusual not-for-profit. Business is amazing, revenues are stable or growing, profit is never an issue. For juniors, work can be quite interesting thanks to the Belgian industry-wide helicopter view Sirris enjoys. Great for PhD students: salaries are higher than the scrawny grants Belgian universities pay. If your research topic is of interest to Sirris and you are currently in a Belgian uni, joining while pursuing your thesis is a very smart move. There is some job stability. Stay put for 2-3 years, always say "thank you" to managers. Also, factor in the 50% home-working time you get.

Cons

Despite the internal talk, salaries are lower than in industry. Managers are mostly science PhD-like profiles who earnestly believe "management is easy". They promote people to their "liking", meaning that the best odds are with a) males b) Dutch-speaking c) who hold science PhDs. Look for people they "like", and notice there's a lot of upward politicking, cajoling, flattering. Downward, expect manipulation (pushing the right buttons) to keep subordinates in check. Everybody else: even if you are a top-star performer, to be recognized for your contribution, join another employer. Despite sitting on considerable cash reserves, Sirris did some abrupt layoffs in the past n years. It fired top-of-the-line money-making machines, because managers didn't like them. Job stability? Really?

5
3.0
14 Nov 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nice R&D projects; great autonomy; low pressure (projects with no (real) obligation of results)

Cons

Very few opportunities of individual development; weak corporate culture (the different departments have their own culture and they don't work with the other ones); more expert in getting public funds than expert in tech innovation.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All