Toxic Workplace / Poor Management - Cybersecurity Analyst Selective Insurance Employee Review

1.0
8 Nov 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are not a lot of positives with Selective Insurance

Cons

Toxic work environment, managers that have no clue what they are doing. There's a level of Micromanagement that occurs if you challenge anything out of the norm. Its your typical 1970's insurance company, no diversity, no diversity in thought. I had a couple of incidents with a toxic, power hungry manager that treated me different than other employees. I went to HR and they were dismissive and non-existent. Often your HR rep would change sometimes monthly, so there was really no support from HR. I went to Senior Leadership with my issues about being treated differently and Senior Leadership basically told me to be quiet. This company truly is awful, its like working in a prison.

Explore other reviews about Selective Insurance

5.0
17 Apr 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Strong but difficult leadership during transformation.

Cons

Relocation causing some some concern

2
1.0
26 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Decent benefits and decent coworkers

Cons

Working at Selective was a toxic work environment shaped by favoritism, excessive workload expectations, and poor boundaries around employee availability. Management often applied expectations unevenly, which created a lack of fairness and accountability. High performance did not always seem to be the primary factor in decision-making, which undermined trust in leadership. There was also a strong “big fish, small pond” dynamic, where internal status and informal influence often carried more weight than actual performance or collaboration. This contributed to a highly political environment where trust between colleagues was limited and information did not always feel safe to share openly. Employees were expected to be available far beyond normal working hours, creating an unsustainable “always on” culture with no real work-life balance. The workload was consistently too high for the compensation provided. Internal politics further interfered with day-to-day work and made collaboration more difficult than it needed to be. In practice, this environment often encouraged self-preservation over teamwork, which made it difficult to build trust or rely on others consistently. Overall, the environment was not structured in a way that supported long-term employee wellbeing or retention. This is not a workplace that supports a healthy work-life balance. For me, the experience felt unsustainable, and over time it became clear that the environment was not conducive to long-term growth or wellbeing.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All