It was good until it wasn't - Anonymous employee SecurityScorecard Employee Review

1.0
6 Jun 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Remote work - although that started changing wit mandatory RTO - Some people in the company are very smart and great to work with

Cons

Mediocre SLT filled with "yes men" who obey the CEO. The smart and bright people either gave up, or were let go due to not following orders. This has led the company to deteriorate both in product quality and work culture. Masking layoffs behind letting people go due to "performance issues" Constant change in roadmap - nothing is solid or long term, as long as it's blessed by the CEO, it's top priority (and top priorities are changing at least on a quarterly basis, sometimes more often) The only goal is to be cashflow positive no matter what - ignore the product issues, rather save money wherever you can (cheaper labour, cheaper tools, layoffs)

Explore other reviews about SecurityScorecard

5.0
31 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Opportunity to interact with major companies and learn cybersecurity solutions. Sales training is helpful.

Cons

Sales targets can be demanding during some quarters.

2.0
6 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

SecurityScorecard has smart, hardworking people, and there are real opportunities to take on meaningful work quickly. If you are someone who can operate independently, solve ambiguous problems, and move fast, you can have a lot of impact here. There are also pockets of strong cross-functional collaboration, especially among employees who are genuinely trying to keep the business moving despite constant change.

Cons

The biggest issue is leadership instability and inconsistent operating discipline. Priorities change quickly, ownership is often unclear, and too much critical work depends on a small number of people rather than durable processes or properly staffed teams. There is a pattern of asking employees to absorb more scope without the resources, authority, or support required to execute sustainably. Decision-making can feel reactive instead of strategic. Different teams may push overlapping initiatives without clear alignment, which creates confusion, duplicated work, and unnecessary political friction. There is also a tendency to reward urgency over planning, which leads to burnout and makes it difficult to build systems that last. Communication from leadership often feels disconnected from the reality of day-to-day execution. The company talks about transformation and innovation, but the internal operating model does not always support that ambition.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All