employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Research to Practice

Is this your company?

Toxic, Rude - Anonymous employee Research to Practice Employee Review

1.0
15 Mar 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Decent pay and ok benefits.

Cons

Rude, verbally abusive coworkers. Never in my entire professional career have I been spoken to the way I was spoken to in this company. Hostile work environment with a mix of temperamental/verbally abusive supervisors and other supervisors that turn a blind eye/let them get away with it. Shaky, inconsistent onboarding process. Conflicting information from different supervisors and a culture of blame towards employees instead of being accountable for poor leadership. RUN, don't walk, RUN away from this company. I didn't believe the bad reviews I read here, took a chance on this company, and regretted it. Save yourself the wasted time and stress.

Explore other reviews about Research to Practice

5.0
10 Jan 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Everyone I have worked with has been so nice and helpful

Cons

none to note at this time!

1
1.0
1 Oct 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The entire company is remote, so you can work from home

Cons

-No transparency on the inner workings of the company, particularly financial. -Contracts say there is no pharmaceutical marketing, but they prioritize showcasing the drugs of companies who have funded programs. -When someone leaves the company, they don't hire they just pile more work on current employees with no pay increase. -There is pressure to be on call 24/7 and drop everything if the CEO needs something. -There is minimal upward mobility and little room for change or sharing constructive feedback. -Their operations systems are quite poor - no database, just lots of repetitive spreadsheets. -Leadership is very passive aggressive, with no clear communication on agendas/action items/directives for meetings. -The company is run by people who've been in leadership for decades or are part of the founder's family. These individuals get priority in decision making, but do not have the professional development growth trajectory to back it up. -Also the one HR professional also manages the founder's personal properties. Felt like a conflict of interest.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All