employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Reach Strategies

Is this your company?

We find folks typically like to find something else to do. - Anonymous employee Reach Strategies Employee Review

2.0
11 Mar 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mission to electrify transportation attracts idealistic, like-minded colleagues who want to do good in the world and are generally kind and respectful.

Cons

The CEO says it right out in the open in a blog post linked from the “careers” page about applying for a job with REACH Strategies. Pay careful attention: “We’ve learned that whether or not someone might like working in our environment is a bit of a yes/no proposition … rather than being something that we can necessarily teach. If you are the kind of person who inherently understands the importance of what we do and sees the value in how we do it, we’ve heard that REACH is about the best place to work possible. But if that fit isn’t there, we find folks typically like to find something else to do.” In other words, the revolving door is just our quirky little way of doing business, not a bright red flag indicating that something is very wrong. If you don’t like it, leave it. No big deal. It’s not us, it’s you. You’re just a bad “fit,” one more person on the perpetually growing list of the many “folks” who “typically like to find something else to do.” On the surface, REACH Strategies looks pretty good. We care about the environment and progressive causes. We are working for something we believe in. We “check in” with each other at the beginning of team calls. How bad can this possibly be? But beneath the surface, there is an undercurrent of deep dysfunction: a pervasive lack of trust, no delegation in decision making, autocratic “gotcha” micromanagement, unprofessional flashes of disdain, blame and disrespect (in one on one meetings, in front of others, and behind your back), condescending judgements about performance and aptitude, an absence of accountability and transparency. Be forewarned: REACH Strategies serves as evidence that remote workers are at a disadvantage when dealing with dysfunctional management, who by definition tend to exploit that imbalance whenever possible. In a mostly remote workplace, there are no water cooler conversations between colleagues where observations and concerns can be easily shared. When management is disrespectful to a team member in a virtual meeting, sympathetic eye contact is impossible. Getting together over coffee to commiserate is usually not an option. “Was it just me?” is a question that almost always goes unasked and unanswered. The average tenure at REACH is measured in months and not years, a crucial fact that is not included in posted job descriptions. Fortunately for former employees and for potential job applicants, we have Glassdoor to share our experiences at REACH. It wasn’t just you. Not by a long shot. The revolving door business model may have served the business owner’s interests for years, but its days are now numbered. The cat is finally out of the bag. This is clearly an existential crisis for REACH.

Explore other reviews about Reach Strategies

5.0
7 Apr 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The title says it all - if you are looking for meaningful work and a great team of people to do it with, REACH is the place for you! Important, impactful work with a mix of writing, event planning, and creativity. Not to mention, the team is filled with wonderful people I enjoy spending time when we get the chance. I'm thankful to feel part of a team that cares and supports one another all while producing excellent work for our clients.

Cons

Accountability, time management, positivity, and exceptional standards are all qualities for success at REACH and not everyone has them. Oh, and egos are not tolerated.

1
1.0
10 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Healthcare benefits are solid. The only real positive was the people I met—many of whom had similar negative experiences. A number of us have stayed connected afterward and support each other, which says a lot about what it was like to work there.

Cons

Leadership culture is deeply problematic. Employee concerns are often dismissed or reframed in ways that feel like gaslighting. Comments from leadership can make you question your own judgment, even when the issues are obvious. Extremely high turnover. I personally counted well over a dozen employees who either left or were let go within a relatively short window. That level of churn is not normal and should be a red flag to anyone considering joining. Performance management is disorganized and inconsistent. Expectations shift, documentation is sloppy, and processes lack transparency. Micromanagement is intense—down to tracking time in small increments—which creates a culture of surveillance rather than trust. Workflows are chaotic. Feedback and edits are scattered across multiple platforms (Google Docs, Slack, etc.), making it difficult to keep track of direction or priorities. There is a pattern of overpromising in proposals and expecting teams to deliver work that isn’t realistically scoped or resourced. Decision-making is highly top-down. Senior leadership sets direction but pushes execution challenges onto middle managers and staff without adequate support. The environment is stressful to the point of being unhealthy. I experienced significant physical effects from the stress, which ultimately led me to leave.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All