Don't Work Here - Content Marketer Radancy Employee Review

2.0
18 Oct 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Some awesome coworkers that will make you laugh and bond with you about how much you hate your job. - Cool views.

Cons

- Nothing TMP offers is different or better than the next recruitment software or marketing agency. - TMP's "Innovation Labs" is stagnant and pretty useless. Go to the website and look at the innovation labs page. You will find a bunch of random tech buzzwords and cool graphics that have absolutely nothing to do with TMP's offering. They even have a "Looking at the Future of Social" document from 2014 on the page dedicated to innovation. - No one, including the director of content marketing, knows how to clearly define what the content marketing team does. - No one on the content team actually knows what the director of content marketing does. - Account team and management only care about churning out content as fast as possible. Uninspired and repetitive content is the result of this. - Egos in management lead to undervalued marketers. - Extremely high turnover rate but no changes being made to fix it. - Below average compensation with above average workload. - No real career path in content - New roles are being created within the content team, but they are essentially resurrected roles that the director eliminated just a few months ago. The new content strategist role is the old content manager role.

Explore other reviews about Radancy

5.0
1 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great place to grow, flexible with family matters and a good work life balance. Learned a lot. Flexible time off is a good perk.

Cons

The rebrand removed a lot of personality from the company which made it hard to service legacy clients.

1
2.0
17 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people and direct coworkers were genuinely supportive and collaborative. Many employees were dealing with similar challenges, which created a strong sense of teamwork and willingness to help each other. Despite broader organizational issues, most teams worked hard and tried to support one another however they could.

Cons

Leadership doesn’t seem to have a clear direction for the company, so priorities and decisions were constantly changing. A lot of decisions would get made and then completely reversed a few months later, which made it hard to feel confident in anything long term. There were also a lot of staffing and restructuring changes without proper training or support, so people were basically expected to figure things out as they went. The company became very focused on enforcing in-office policies and making sure people were physically at their desks, while employees hadn’t received raises in years despite heavier workloads and inflation. That disconnect was really discouraging and definitely contributed to burnout. Burnout was something constantly talked about across teams, but it rarely felt like anything meaningful was done to actually support employees or improve workloads. A lot of employees were also expected to sell or support products they didn’t fully believe in, which made it hard to feel set up for success from the beginning.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All