A bad engineering organization, a nice place to do nothing and get paid. - Senior Software Engineer Digital Innovation Group Providence Employee Review

2.0
31 Jul 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

People are nice generally and you can show up at 930, leave at 430 or 5 and no one seems to care. If you just want a job that you show up to, do whatever you're told to regardless of if its a good decision, get paid and go home then this is a great place to work.

Cons

WFH was revoked without notice or cause for entire team. Management is focused around pretty graphs in jira over delivering quality software. Employee standards are arbitrary and enforced wildly differently depending on the manager. Claim to be agile, but are really just waterfall without the ability to commit to long term plans. Extremely dysfunctional inter team communication. RCA meetings are aggressive and used as tools for punishing employees rather than to resolve actual meaningful issues. Software is barely used by customers, managers or leadership. Its not unusual to have the product owner of a product lecture at length about features which are no longer in existence, because they haven't run the software in two months. Many internal "norms" which are codified in a norms sheet. These are used to encourage people to "have backbone" or "have fun" or "crave constructive conflict". In reality these are used as a means to bludgeon employees via reviews - either by not following them, following them too much, or frequently one followed immediately by the other. The biggest one: this is not a startup. Its the software arm of a behemoth healthcare organization which does not understand engineering in any way. Incentives from top to bottom are focused on appeasing the bureaucracy rather than solving problems. They will obscure this fact by talking about agile, drive to go further, customer obsession etc... And I think there's a genuine desire for that to be true. It is not.

Explore other reviews about Providence

5.0
21 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great pay, great pay, good 401k

Cons

The company has become so cheap.

1.0
5 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Strong mission-driven work with many compassionate employees who genuinely care about patients. Providence also offers useful commuter benefits through TriMet and a solid HSA option compared to many employers in similar roles.

Cons

In my experience across multiple Providence clinics, the culture consistently prioritized speed and productivity over training, understanding, and employee support. Questions were not treated as part of the learning process. They were often treated as evidence of incompetence, which created environments where employees became afraid to ask for clarification. Onboarding and workflow training were extremely inconsistent. Much of the “training” consisted of shadowing already overwhelmed employees while trying to absorb complex workflows in real time. Important mistakes were sometimes corrected behind the scenes instead of being addressed immediately, leading to situations where employees were later criticized for patterns they did not fully understand were happening. When I requested clearer written workflows because that is how I learn best, the response felt defensive rather than collaborative. Communication often felt centered around frustration that training took time instead of recognition that proper onboarding is necessary in healthcare operations. Over time, this created a culture where anxiety increased, confidence decreased, and employees felt pressured to appear self-sufficient instead of properly supported. Burnout was constant and visible across nearly every employee I worked with. Many staff members seemed emotionally exhausted and unsupported while still being expected to maintain extremely high productivity standards. Providence also advertises PTO in a way that sounds more generous than it functionally is. Employees are required to use PTO for mandatory holiday closures, significantly reducing the actual flexibility of that time off. Attendance policies were rigid and heavily disciplinary in practice, with little room for nuance or real-life circumstances. In my experience, context and communication often mattered less than metrics. I also found HR interactions to feel more punitive than collaborative. During attendance discussions, I came prepared with extensive documentation and prior communications showing that several situations had previously been understood as approved or excused. I was told that information had not been received prior to the meeting and had to explain everything verbally in real time instead. The experience felt less like a conversation intended to resolve misunderstandings and more like a process moving toward a predetermined conclusion. Overall, Providence employs many good people, but the operational culture I experienced frequently prioritized optics, speed, and performance metrics over sustainable training, employee development, psychological safety, and long-term retention.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All