Worst Company I ever worked - Software Engineer PAYable Employee Review

1.0
12 Sept 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- If you are with low qualifications, you can get a job in their easily. Then tend to give chance

Cons

- They deduct EPF and ETF money from your salary but they don't sign the documents to add it to your EPF account - They tend to give lesser salary when it compared to other companies - They don't pay salary on time. Sometimes it takes more than a week than the normal paying date. Then employees got issues with their personal loan deductions. - They lie about the technologies and opportunities at the beginning. If you are a QA, there are no automation stuff in there. They just lie about it. (Got this news from a QA who is currently working at the company.) - They force you to work more than 10 hours per day. (Standard working hours in SL is 8 hours) - For festival seasons, you need to stay online until 11pm - Even though there are separate customer support, QAs needs to stay online in the weekend for give solutions for customer support. Management blame us if we are late to reply it in the weekend. They don't understand people have other things to do in weekend. (from another QA who left the company. I reached them and get their experiences before writing this) - Toxic leadership. They expect you to work extra hours and your salary is still same and there are no any extra wages. - Management give the employees hard deadlines and to achieve those deadlines, employees have to work 10-11 hours per day

Explore other reviews about PAYable

5.0
2 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Work Life Balance - Healthy work Culture - Work from Home

Cons

- zero nothing at all.

1.0
21 Apr 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company had a good structure in place initially, especially in the Sales Department

Cons

Unfortunately, the sales department experienced one of the most disheartening and unprofessional episodes during my tenure. Several team members, including team leaders and the Head of Sales, were forced out through what appeared to be a coordinated and unjust termination strategy. The Head of Operations (HOO) played a central role in this situation, exhibiting management practices that were aggressive, demoralizing, and far from industry standards. Unrealistic targets, lack of support, and emotional stress were commonplace under his leadership. Concerns about work-life balance, respect, and ethical governance were completely overlooked. It was especially disillusioning to see top management, including the CEO, remain aligned with the HOO despite repeated red flags.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All