Pros
I gained clarity over what it means to be kind and caring and not because I vote management as a good example.
Cons
The company talks a lot about “real leadership,” but in practice, authenticity only goes one way — the way that aligns with leadership’s Christian worldview. Bible study sessions and groupings divided employees into believers and non-believers, and there was no space for people who didn’t fit neatly into their categories. Post-Christian perspectives? Not welcome — that would trigger insecurity. Employees who held different beliefs or simply didn’t want to share their personal faith often felt uncomfortable, dismissed, or mischaracterized. My integrity and who I am as a person were challenged when I was told I wasn’t "authentic,” even though I couldn’t safely express myself without risking my job. Attempts to raise concerns were shut down and framed as negativity, even though leadership’s behavior — scolding, embarrassing employees, and creating situations that made people cry — was the real source of the negativity. In addition, personal boundaries were ignored. Leadership tried to set me up on a date with a coworker, recommended Christian dating websites, and pushed participation in workplace social events that went against my beliefs — for example, being asked to wear white in protest of Pink Dot, an event I support as a supporter of LGBTQ+ rights. Situations like these created an environment that was not only uncomfortable but inappropriate and emotionally taxing. In short, this is a workplace where the stated value of authenticity clashes with rigid religious expectations, psychological safety is lacking, and personal boundaries are not respected. Employees who don’t fit the narrow mold may find the environment stressful, exclusionary, and unsupportive. Also, the company has consistently showcased a facilitation faculty that hasn’t visibly evolved over the years, leading to a perception that the company is larger and more robust than it actually is.