Better than being unemployed but its not the same company it used to be. - Senior Account Representative OTIS Employee Review

3.0
11 Feb 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They have a solid training program and don't throw sales reps out into the field before they are ready. They have great tools to help you organize your sales calls and great back office support to help you get your proposals out on the street.

Cons

Hit your numbers and/or get in good with the branch manager or you're out on the streets. Salary for sales reps is among the lowest in the industry and the commission structure puts you at war with your superintendant on major projects. The superintendant is usually around a lot longer than you are, so good luck winning those fights.

Explore other reviews about OTIS

5.0
12 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Real team work oriented. Feels very much being part of the company

Cons

Needs juggling multiple jobs! A lot of travel involved. But great learning opportunities follow these.

1.0
6 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Otis is a well-known company with a strong brand name, established customers, and exposure to major commercial accounts. The role gives you real responsibility quickly, especially if you are managing a service territory with active customer issues, contract renewals, and operational escalations. The experience can build strong skills in account management, customer retention, field coordination, problem solving, and handling high-pressure customer situations. You get direct exposure to customers, technicians, operations, and leadership, which can be valuable if you want to grow in service, sales, or facilities-related industries

Cons

The biggest issue is poor management. The branch has serious operational problems, but leadership does not seem to have a clear plan to fix them. Instead, the pressure gets pushed down to the account manager, who ends up dealing with angry customers, unresolved service issues, delayed communication, and internal problems they do not fully control. Management needs to take more ownership of the environment they are putting employees into. New hires should not be expected to clean up long-standing territory issues without proper training, realistic timelines, and real support. There is a big difference between holding people accountable and blaming them for problems that were already there. The leadership style feels reactive instead of organized. Problems are addressed after they become urgent, communication is inconsistent, and expectations can feel disconnected from what is actually happening in the field. This creates unnecessary pressure on employees and makes it harder to rebuild trust with customers. The role would be much more manageable if management provided stronger onboarding, clearer priorities, better internal coordination, and more realistic expectations. Without that, employees can end up stuck between frustrated customers and a leadership team that does not provide enough support to actually solve the root issues.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All