Great Place To Work - Program Cost Control Analyst Northrop Grumman Employee Review

5.0
4 Nov 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Employees are positive toward innovation and change. Diversity is promoted and practices. If you work hard here, you will be rewarded. There is no sense of anyone trying to stab you in the back. Your Manager will take care of you and there are many resources to sound your concerns. Everyone is very cordial and professional to one another. A business casual environment that is challenging and will allow you to maintain your own work-life balance as long as you are meeting the goals of you set up that is in line with your manager and the company.

Cons

High rotations of people moving around from one job/company to the next. It's an 8-5 schedule M-F.

Explore other reviews about Northrop Grumman

5.0
8 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Consistent work with lots of future growth in Utah

Cons

Disorganized management leading to high turnover, attrition, and burnout for those being managed

1.0
11 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not much pros but talented coworkers.

Cons

I joined expecting a long-term career and initially had a positive experience. Unfortunately, the culture changed significantly after leadership transitions. Micromanagement increased, decision-making became highly centralized, and employee morale steadily declined. Many experienced employees and managers left during my time there, making it difficult to maintain continuity and trust within the organization. The work itself was meaningful, and I had the opportunity to support important projects with talented colleagues. However, recognition, career growth, and employee retention did not appear to receive the same level of attention as process, reporting, and management oversight. My layoff was communicated as unrelated to performance, which was appreciated. However, after years of contribution and institutional knowledge, the overall experience left me feeling that employees were viewed as replaceable rather than valued long-term assets.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All