Don't walk away.. RUN. - Staff Engineer Leidos Employee Review

2.0
15 Feb 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The only reason to work at this company is if you have no other choice. The benefits are horrible and you get the sense that the only people that matter are the managers. If you are a member of the cool kids group you'll do fine... other wise move on...

Cons

Career management structure puts non-engineers over engineers and there is a lot of resentment there because engineers are treated differently. Junior Engineers over the careers of more senior engineers, it's simply an environment that breeds back stabbing and throwing people under the bus ..and the senior management is blind to what happens. There is absolutely no teamwork, just figure it out yourself and you'd best do it quickly or you'll be next under those bus tires. Kind of crazy considering the critical nature of some of the work they are doing.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
15 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great culture, supportive management, encouragement for self development

Cons

Some decisions move too slowly.

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All