Company Future Is Very Uncertain - Anonymous employee Leidos Employee Review

2.0
8 Jun 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Depending upon the area/contract/business function you work in, the people on your team can be really great, however those types of teams have been very few in recent years.

Cons

Even prior to the company split of SAIC, Leidos has had countless struggles in operations and management. Unsuccessful contract bids, lackluster performance on contract wins and an ever changing of management staff should be an indicator that there are foundational problems within this organization. Within the past several years there has been a mass exodus of key personnel which should be an indicator for this company's instability, especially since the majority of these personnel chose to leave on their own and were not pushed out. All of this coupled with a work environment that can be challenging if not toxic at times, makes this a very difficult company to recommend to others.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
22 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Ability to work from home

Cons

There is few opportunities to promote

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All