Great place to work, brilliant people - Systems Engineer L3Harris Employee Review

4.0
3 Oct 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some of the sharpest people I have ever worked with. All were courteous and professional. Great company to work for.

Cons

One very large workload, used to have 2 people doing the job. The other is reorg pains. Company moving from being a holding company to a corporate run entity. Buildings very old and need updating.

avatar
L3Harris Response
6y
Thanks for your review! We agree, we have some of the best and brightest talent working for us, and that's what helps make L3Harris such a great place to work! We do recognize that there are some locations with older buildings, and we will be sure to share this feedback with our facilities team. We wish you continued success.

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
8 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The compensation and benefits package are very strong and attractive

Cons

They doesn't allow remote work

2.0
5 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All