employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Integra LifeSciences

Engaged employer

Much better places to work! - Sales Integra LifeSciences Employee Review

2.0
29 Jun 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good, life-saving products Good strategic plan theoretically, executive leadership can’t seem to execute however Decent enough pay and benefits Some very talented, nice colleagues—tenure is usually short though

Cons

Executive leadership a joke, this is not a meritocracy company, rather one filled with cronyism and protection of a certain few for no seemingly good reason. DEI on paper vs reality—no women or diversity in senior sales positions Pricing increase strategy not at all aligned with the overall healthcare market, losing share and has a terrible reputation in most health systems, need a much better long term strategy other than price Lots of pending lawsuits, horrible culture which starts at the top, impossible to change from the bottom Lots of turnover in the sales teams, especially Tissue Tech which negatively affects relationships and growth Leadership is protected here for some mythical reason-needs to be gutted. Talented ones leave. The ones in place are largely a joke and wouldn’t be employed anywhere else.

Explore other reviews about Integra LifeSciences

5.0
22 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Salary and commission were great.

Cons

I have nothing negative to say

1.0
18 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

To provide a balanced perspective, one positive aspect was the company's willingness to offer flexible work arrangements.

Cons

I would encourage prospective employees to carefully evaluate the company culture before joining. In my experience, the work environment lacked the level of professionalism and collaborative leadership I expected. Leadership decisions at the senior level often appeared to be driven by personal viewpoints rather than objective discussion and open engagement. Employees who did not align with the preferred direction could experience resistance rather than constructive dialogue. The culture felt more aligned with a "my way or the highway" management style than a collaborative and inclusive approach. I also experienced situations where information communicated about my performance appeared inconsistent with my actual work contributions and outcomes. Rather than constructive feedback supported by objective metrics and open discussion, I felt there were instances where narratives surrounding performance were inaccurate or misrepresented. This created concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and the overall feedback process. The company has also faced regulatory challenges in the past, which may be worth researching independently as part of your due diligence process. My experience ultimately did not align with my expectations for leadership, transparency, and organizational culture.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All