Good Career Start - Anonymous employee Infor Employee Review

3.0
16 Aug 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Infor is a great place for people just starting their careers. It's a good relaxed environment that isn't too stressful depending on your position. There's opportunities to grow within the company, but you have to make your own path and make sure management is informed in order to find the promotions or lateral movements that you want. It's also a great place if you are content and want a 9-5 with minimal stress to be able to enjoy a life outside of work.

Cons

If you are good at what you do, you are given more work without compensation while others on your team can do less and even say that they don't want to take on the extra work yet they are getting the same benefits you do with less responsibility. There's no ability to work from home despite not needing to be in the office (dependent on department and management). Positions are underpaid and there hasn't been an annual salary increase in two years. Information passed from upper management down through the ranks is very limited despite not being sensitive information.

Explore other reviews about Infor

5.0
17 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Good people - Good benefits -

Cons

- OffShore heavily. Good portion of company is based outside of the US

3.0
22 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Cons

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Infor Response
1mo
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All