A great place to work! - Anonymous employee Health Catalyst Employee Review

5.0
4 Oct 2020
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Taking up Dan B’s call to arms, I am submitting the first of what will be an annual Glassdoor review. I was part of the Medicity team that was welcomed to Health Catalyst in July 2018. Some of my comments date back to then but are still relevant today. Back then we had heard all the feedback prior to closing about how great a company Health Catalyst was to work for. But I had my concerns (it had to be too good to be true, right?). None of them were valid. As soon as the deal closed, People Operations and IT got directly engaged. Even though the company was closed for the July 4th week, they all worked to make us welcome. All the foundational things that mattered (salary, healthcare, benefits, laptops) were immediately addressed. Having those items quickly settled removed a lot of stress and allowed us to focus on the integration work. We have seen that same welcoming onboarding continue with subsequent acquisitions. The transparency and directness were also felt immediately. On the first post-close call with the Medicity staff, Dan stated that in 30 days, every Medician would know their status with Health Catalyst. In other words, a layoff was coming, but it would done quickly and then we would move on. True to his word, every Medicity employee knew their standing by July 31st. This RIF was also the most compassionate exercise that I have ever witnessed. Displaced TMs were given an extremely generous severance package, but more importantly were supported by the company and fellow team members. Personal and professional friendships were not immediately cutoff, as is the case with other layoff implementations. Their release date was not the day of notification but approximately 30 days later. They were offered the option of continuing to work during that time or leave. But the choice was theirs. In addition, they were allowed to retain their Health Catalyst email addresses, which was a subtle but especially important success factor for their job search. Like all companies, COVID had a significant impact on our business. The Leadership Team was very thoughtful about how to address the revenue impacts created by COVID. It would have been quite easy to follow the lead of other HIT software companies and layoff large numbers of employees. But Health Catalyst took a more compassionate approach by eliminating only the 401k match. There was a hiring freeze, a promotion freeze, and a salary freeze. But no other salary or benefit reductions were implemented. This was greatly appreciated by most team members, particularly those of us who had previously gone through large layoffs. Finally, regarding Dan. He is one of the most charismatic leaders for whom I have had the pleasure to work. He lives his values. He is direct, humble, transparent, and compassionate. He exhibits all of the traits that a great CEO should have, yet rarely is witnessed elsewhere. He is Health Catalyst.

Cons

Health Catalyst is a company for which I hope to work for an exceptionally long time. I hope to never leave. But there are some issues of concern that I hope can be addressed. The organization is very flat. The Leadership Team has a number of people who have ascended in the organization as the company has grown. That is expected, in fact desirable. But some on the LT have not grown as their role responsibilities have increased. Many continue to perform a significant amount of individual contributor work, when their focus should be on strategy definition/execution, resource management, and staff development. They should be growing the company, and the next generation of company leaders. In addition, some on the LT are unable to delegate even the smallest tasks and decisions to their leadership team. This has led to a large layer of upper and middle level managers who are underutilized, and whose professional growth is stunted. There is also a concentration of knowledge at the LT level that presents risk to company should a key LT member depart. It also could result in attrition to key ELT members who feel stagnated and frustrated. Associated with all of that is the risk caused by having no apparent succession plans in place. As a company owner, this issue is particularly troubling. If an LT member were to leave, all of their domain knowledge would leave with them and would then have to be learned by their replacement. It would be a setback to the company. Not insurmountable, but highly disruptive. And totally avoidable by having LT members formulate delegation and succession plans. One other area of concern is company identity: are we a services company enabled by technology, or a technology company enabled by services? I think we originally were the former and are now moving towards the latter. But communication and training are needed to align strategy throughout the organization. There is a lot of confusion among team members on this point. And all team members must hold each other accountable to that strategic goal. Finally, both billability and resource utilization continue to be impacted by this technology/services confusion. A mandatory annual quota for Professional Services staff, while common in a consulting company, causes distraction when the primary focus becomes billability. Some team members are focused more on making their number, sometimes to the detriment of customer success. I humbly offer these comments with positive intent in the hope that we can make an already great company better. Thanks for reading them.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
5y
Thank you for this thoughtful, detailed and insightful review. And thank you for your generous and kind comments specific to my role. They are meaningful, and appreciated, and they represent a lot to live up to. I also appreciate your comments and feedback on where we can improve, and your insights are resonant. We need to build more formality and consistency in our succession planning processes, including more deliberate career development opportunity as well. I also agree with the strategic importance of clarifying our primary and secondary focus as a company. Here again, your perspective is insightful and resonant, and I agree we need to be clear here. I also agree that the answer has evolved as we have evolved and matured as a company. We will make it a goal as part of our 2021 strategic planning process to be more clear that we are primarily a technology company, with services offered to complement the use of our technology and to enable our clients' success in seeing measurable improvements. This technology-first focus should inform many aspects of our prioritization and definition of success. We will do a great deal of work to communicate and strengthen our focus and clarity here in 2021 and beyond. Thank you for your commitment to our company, for your desire to continue to contribute here at Health Catalyst for years to come -- that is my desire as well, and I look forward to being your teammate and colleague in the months and years ahead! Best, Dan

Explore other reviews about Health Catalyst

5.0
23 Jan 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Supportive team environment with opportunities to work cross-functionally on meaningful healthcare initiatives. Strong focus on client impact, collaboration, and continuous learning.

Cons

Processes and roles can feel ambiguous at times, requiring employees to be comfortable navigating change and figuring things out as they go.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
3mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. I appreciate the thoughtful recognition of our collaborative culture and the meaningful work the team does together. How we work together matters just as much as what we do. Our operating principles and cultural attributes remain foundational. To address your concerns about processes and roles, as the organization evolves, we’re prioritizing clarity in these areas to better support teams. There’s real momentum building right now, and the work ahead is meaningful. I’m grateful for you and the role you play here, and I’m excited about what we’re building together.
3.0
5 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great Talent & Culture: The people here are highly capable, collaborative, and committed to helping each other succeed. The partnership between onshore and offshore teams works well and is a real strength. There’s a culture of grit and stability that has helped the company navigate multiple major transitions over the years. Mission-Critical Engineering: The work involves complex data infrastructure that requires deep technical expertise. It can be demanding, but seeing these systems run successfully and support real-world operations is consistently rewarding.

Cons

Wage Compression and Retention Risk: Compensation for tenured and high-performing staff has not kept pace with the market for specialized data engineering and support leadership. In practice, tenure can feel undervalued or even penalized. This creates risk around losing institutional knowledge and operational continuity. Stagnant Career Progression: Contrary to stated expectations, strong performance ratings do not consistently translate into meaningful, market-aligned compensation growth. The process of how compensation is benchmarked lacks clarity in practice, obscuring how compensation decisions are made and what is required to advance.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All